}

  /**
   * Starts the server on the loopback interface for the given port.
   *
   * @param port the port to listen to, or 0 for any available port. Automated tests should always
   * use port 0 to avoid flakiness when a specific port is unavailable.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  @JvmOverloads
  public fun start(port: Int = 0) {
    start(InetAddress.getByName("localhost"), port)
  }

		"Total number of bucket scans finished since server start")
	scannerBucketScansStartedMD = NewCounterMD(scannerBucketScansStarted,
		"Total number of bucket scans started since server start")
	scannerDirectoriesScannedMD = NewCounterMD(scannerDirectoriesScanned,
		"Total number of directories scanned since server start")
	scannerObjectsScannedMD = NewCounterMD(scannerObjectsScanned,

**Typer**는 FastAPI의 동생입니다. 그리고 **FastAPI의 CLI**가 되기 위해 생겼습니다. ⌨️ 🚀

## 요구사항

FastAPI는 거인들의 어깨 위에 서 있습니다:

* 웹 부분을 위한 <a href="https://www.starlette.dev/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Starlette</a>.
* 데이터 부분을 위한 <a href="https://docs.pydantic.dev/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Pydantic</a>.

## 설치

<div class="termy">

```console
$ pip install fastapi

    * Si estás comparando Starlette, compáralo con Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Frameworks web (o microframeworks).
* **FastAPI**:
    * De la misma forma en que Starlette usa Uvicorn y no puede ser más rápido que él, **FastAPI** usa Starlette, por lo que no puede ser más rápido que él.

    * Зато он предоставляет Вам инструменты для создания простых веб‑приложений с маршрутизацией по путям и т. п.
    * Если Вы сравниваете Starlette, сравнивайте его с Sanic, Flask, Django и т. д. — веб‑фреймворками (или микрофреймворками).
* **FastAPI**:

* **Starlette** :
    * A les seconde meilleures performances après Uvicorn. Starlette utilise en réalité Uvicorn. De ce fait, il ne peut qu’être plus "lent" qu'Uvicorn car il requiert l'exécution de plus de code.
    * Cependant il nous apporte les outils pour construire une application web simple, avec un routage basé sur des chemins, etc.

    return new Stopwatch(ticker);
  }

  /**
   * Creates (and starts) a new stopwatch using {@link System#nanoTime} as its time source.
   *
   * @since 15.0
   */
  public static Stopwatch createStarted() {
    return new Stopwatch().start();
  }

  /**
   * Creates (and starts) a new stopwatch, using the specified time source.
   *
   * @since 15.0
   */

from starlette.responses import FileResponse as FileResponse  # noqa
from starlette.responses import HTMLResponse as HTMLResponse  # noqa
from starlette.responses import JSONResponse as JSONResponse  # noqa
from starlette.responses import PlainTextResponse as PlainTextResponse  # noqa
from starlette.responses import RedirectResponse as RedirectResponse  # noqa
from starlette.responses import Response as Response  # noqa

    * Se você quer fazer comparações com o Starlette, compare com Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. _Frameworks Web_ (ou _microframeworks_).
* **FastAPI**:
    * Do mesmo modo que Starlette utiliza Uvicorn e não pode ser mais rápido que ele, **FastAPI** utiliza o Starlette, então não tem como ser mais rápido do que o Starlette.

    }
  }

  private void checkAndUpdateState(State oldState, State newState) {
    checkState(
        compareAndUpdateState(oldState, newState),
        "Expected state to be %s, but it was %s",
        oldState,
        newState);
  }

  private boolean compareAndUpdateState(State oldState, State newState) {
    return state.compareAndSet(oldState, newState);
  }