// Test getExecuteType method
    @Test
    public void test_getExecuteType() {
        assertEquals(Constants.EXECUTE_TYPE_CRAWLER, crawlJob.getExecuteType());
    }

    // Test execute method with runAll scenario
    @Test
    public void test_execute_runAll() {
        // Setup test
        crawlJob = new CrawlJob() {
            @Override
            protected int getRunningJobCount() {
                return 0;

    constructor(
      @JvmField var headerTableSizeSetting: Int = SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE,
      private val useCompression: Boolean = true,
      private val out: Buffer,
    ) {
      /**
       * In the scenario where the dynamic table size changes multiple times between transmission of
       * header blocks, we need to keep track of the smallest value in that interval.
       */

        CharMappingItem item = new CharMappingItem(1L, new String[] { "temp" }, "output") {
            @Override
            public String getInputsValue() {
                // Simulate null inputs scenario
                if (getInputs() == null) {
                    return super.getInputsValue();
                }
                return super.getInputsValue();
            }
        };

        if (noOptionsSpecified || allOptionsDisabled) {
            return true;
        }

        // Check if --model is explicitly set (and not part of "all disabled" scenario)
        if (options.model().isPresent()) {
            return options.model().get();
        }

        return false;
    }

    @Override
    public String getDescription() {

### Multi destination replication

The replication design for multiple sites works in a similar manner as described above for two site scenario. However there are some
important exceptions.

            private List<CrawlingInfoParam> storedParams;

            @Override
            public CrawlingInfo getLast(String sessionId) {
                return null; // Return null to simulate create scenario
            }

            @Override
            public void store(CrawlingInfo entity) {
                storedInfo = entity;
                assertEquals(sessionId, entity.getSessionId());
            }

            assertEquals(second, third.next());
            assertEquals(first, second.next());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle cache replacement in complex scenario")
        void testComplexCacheReplacement() {
            Map<String, DfsReferralDataInternal> cache = new HashMap<>();

            // Create multiple entries
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

                        "on ${os.asName()} (bucket $bucketIndex)",
                performanceSubProject = "performance",
                bucketIndex = bucketIndex,
                extraParameters =
                    "--profiler $profiler --tests \"${performanceScenario.scenario.className}.${performanceScenario.scenario.scenario}\"",

  // below by testing their text-processing methods.

  // The organization of this test class is unusual, as it's not done by
  // method, but by overall "scenario". Also, the variety of actual tests we
  // do borders on absurd overkill. Better safe than sorry, though?

  @GwtIncompatible // java.util.BitSet
  public void testSetBits() {
    doTestSetBits(CharMatcher.any());

}

// updates rebalance.bin from let's say 2 pool setup in the middle
// of a rebalance, was expanded can cause z.rebalMeta to be outdated
// due to a missing new pool. This function tries to handle this
// scenario, albeit rare it seems to have occurred in the wild.
//
// since we do not explicitly disallow it, but it is okay for them
// expand and then we continue to rebalance.