assertTrue(SortedIterables.hasSameComparator(Ordering.natural(), Maps.newTreeMap().keySet()));
    assertTrue(
        SortedIterables.hasSameComparator(
            Ordering.natural().reverse(), Sets.newTreeSet(Ordering.natural().reverse())));
  }

  public void testComparator() {
    assertEquals(Ordering.natural(), SortedIterables.comparator(Sets.newTreeSet()));
  }

         * - Under Android, it does.
         *
         * We want users to see the same behavior when they compare a built-in TypeVariable against
         * ours as they do when they perform the same comparison in reverse. To provide that
         * behavior on all platforms, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:
         *

    assertThat(Doubles.stringConverter().reverse().convert(null)).isNull();
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // Double.toString returns different value in GWT.
  public void testStringConverter_reverse() {
    Converter<String, Double> converter = Doubles.stringConverter();
    assertThat(converter.reverse().convert(1.0)).isEqualTo("1.0");
    assertThat(converter.reverse().convert(0.0)).isEqualTo("0.0");

                    for (int i = elements.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
                      list.add(elements[i]);
                    }
                    return Lists.reverse(list);
                  }
                })
            .named("Lists.reverse[ArrayList]")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,
                CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES,
                ListFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE)

        .addHeader(
          "Set-Cookie: a=android; " +
            "expires=Fri, 31-Dec-9999 23:59:59 GMT; " +
            "path=/path; " +
            "domain=${urlWithIpAddress.host}; " +
            "secure",
        ).build(),
    )
    get(urlWithIpAddress)
    val cookies = cookieManager.cookieStore.cookies
    assertThat(cookies.size).isEqualTo(1)
    val cookie = cookies[0]
    assertThat(cookie.name).isEqualTo("a")

    Arrays.sort(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(int[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

     */
    public static final String ISO_DATETIME_FORMAT = "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS'Z'";

    /**
     * The feature for secure processing in XML.
     */
    public static final String FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING = "http://javax.xml.XMLConstants/feature/secure-processing";

    /**
     * The feature for external general entities in XML.
     */

/**
 * Options for use with recursive delete methods ({@link MoreFiles#deleteRecursively} and {@link
 * MoreFiles#deleteDirectoryContents}).
 *
 * @since 33.4.0 (but since 21.0 in the JRE flavor)
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ObjCIncompatible // java.nio.file
public enum RecursiveDeleteOption {
  /**

 *       returned)
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>Alas, {@link #reverse} is a little different. As you read backwards through a chain and
 * encounter a call to {@code reverse}, continue working backwards until a result is determined, and
 * then reverse that result.
 *
 * <h3>Additional notes</h3>
 *

  }

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // should be safe, but not sure if we can avoid the warning
  public <S extends @Nullable T> Ordering<S> reverse() {
    // ordering.reverse() might be optimized, so let it do its thing
    return ordering.<T>reverse().<@NonNull S>nullsLast();
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // still need the right way to explain this
  @Override