*       considered "compiled comments."
 *   <li>An explicit {@code if/throw} (as illustrated below) is always acceptable; we still
 *       recommend using our {@link VerifyException} exception type. Throwing a plain {@link
 *       RuntimeException} is frowned upon.
 *   <li>Use of {@link java.util.Objects#requireNonNull(Object)} is generally discouraged, since

      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
      identification within third-party archives.

      @SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "unchecked"})
      Supplier<List<V>> result = (Supplier) INSTANCE;
      return result;
    }

    @Override
    // We recommend against linkedListValues but need to keep it for compatibility.
    @SuppressWarnings("JdkObsolete")
    public List<?> get() {
      return new LinkedList<>();
    }
  }

    airtime before a decision is made regarding whether they are to be migrated
    to the core.
*   As every PR requires several CPU/GPU hours of CI testing, we discourage
    submitting PRs to fix one typo, one warning,etc. We recommend fixing the
    same issue at the file level at least (e.g.: fix all typos in a file, fix
    all compiler warnings in a file, etc.)
*   Tests should follow the

* 🚨 Avoid using `Optional[SomeType]`
* Instead ✨ **use `Union[SomeType, None]`** ✨.

Both are equivalent and underneath they are the same, but I would recommend `Union` instead of `Optional` because the word "**optional**" would seem to imply that the value is optional, and it actually means "it can be `None`", even if it's not optional and is still required.

 * {@link Collections#singleton(Object)} and <a
 * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/util/Set.html#immutable">{@code Set.of}</a>,
 * we recommend using <i>these</i> classes instead for this reason (as well as for consistency).
 *
 * <h4>Creation</h4>
 *
 * <p>Except for logically "abstract" types like {@code ImmutableCollection} itself, each {@code

 * href="https://github.com/lukas-krecan/future-converter">Future Converter</a>.)
 *
 * <h3>Extension</h3>
 *
 * If you want a class like {@code FluentFuture} but with extra methods, we recommend declaring your
 * own subclass of {@link ListenableFuture}, complete with a method like {@link #from} to adapt an
 * existing {@code ListenableFuture}, implemented atop a {@link ForwardingListenableFuture} that

---

"_If anyone is looking to build a production Python API, I would highly recommend **FastAPI**. It is **beautifully designed**, **simple to use** and **highly scalable**, it has become a **key component** in our API first development strategy and is driving many automations and services such as our Virtual TAC Engineer._"

   * syntax</a>.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({
    "NonApiType", // acts as a direct substitute for a constructor call
    "JdkObsolete", // We recommend against this method but need to keep it for compatibility.
  })
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> LinkedList<E> newLinkedList() {
    return new LinkedList<>();
  }

  /**

---

"_If anyone is looking to build a production Python API, I would highly recommend **FastAPI**. It is **beautifully designed**, **simple to use** and **highly scalable**, it has become a **key component** in our API first development strategy and is driving many automations and services such as our Virtual TAC Engineer._"