* implementation of TypeVariable, but the behavior of the built-in implementation differs
         * across platforms:
         *
         * - Under the JDK, the built-in TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't recognize instances
         *   of our TypeVariable implementation.
         *
         * - Under Android, it does.
         *
         * We want users to see the same behavior when they compare a built-in TypeVariable against

    /**
     * Deletes a search log entry based on its type.
     *
     * @param e The log entity to delete (ClickLog, FavoriteLog, UserInfo, or SearchLog)
     * @throws FessSystemException if the entity type is not recognized
     */
    public void deleteSearchLog(final Object e) {
        if (e instanceof final ClickLog clickLog) {
            clickLogBhv.delete(clickLog);
        } else if (e instanceof final FavoriteLog favoriteLog) {

func nilRegisterNumber(name string, n int16) (int16, bool) {
	return 0, false
}

// Set configures the architecture specified by GOARCH and returns its representation.
// It returns nil if GOARCH is not recognized.
func Set(GOARCH string, shared bool) *Arch {
	switch GOARCH {
	case "386":
		return archX86(&x86.Link386)
	case "amd64":
		return archX86(&x86.Linkamd64)
	case "arm":
		return archArm()
	case "arm64":

    }

    /**
     * Disables external resources for the SAX parser to prevent XXE attacks.
     * @param parser the SAX parser to configure
     * @throws SAXNotRecognizedException if the parser doesn't recognize the feature
     * @throws SAXNotSupportedException if the parser doesn't support the feature
     */

</p>

<p>
<code>R10</code> points to the <code>g</code> (goroutine) structure.
Within assembler source code, this pointer must be referred to as <code>g</code>;
the name <code>R10</code> is not recognized.
</p>

<p>
To make it easier for people and compilers to write assembly, the ARM linker
allows general addressing forms and pseudo-operations like <code>DIV</code> or <code>MOD</code>

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Implementations can be generally assumed to prioritize memory efficiency, then speed of
 *       access, and lastly speed of creation.
 *   <li>The {@code copyOf} methods will sometimes recognize that the actual copy operation is
 *       unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} should copy the data only
 *       once. This reduces the expense of habitually making defensive copies at API boundaries.

  }

  /**
   * Parses the specified string as a single-precision floating point value. The ASCII character
   * {@code '-'} (<code>'&#92;u002D'</code>) is recognized as the minus sign.
   *
   * <p>Unlike {@link Float#parseFloat(String)}, this method returns {@code null} instead of
   * throwing an exception if parsing fails. Valid inputs are exactly those accepted by {@link

         * implementation of TypeVariable, but the behavior of the built-in implementation differs
         * across platforms:
         *
         * - Under the JDK, the built-in TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't recognize instances
         *   of our TypeVariable implementation.
         *
         * - Under Android, it does.
         *
         * We want users to see the same behavior when they compare a built-in TypeVariable against

    java.util.regex.Pattern
        .compile(fpPattern);
  }

  /**
   * Parses the specified string as a double-precision floating point value. The ASCII character
   * {@code '-'} (<code>'&#92;u002D'</code>) is recognized as the minus sign.
   *
   * <p>Unlike {@link Double#parseDouble(String)}, this method returns {@code null} instead of
   * throwing an exception if parsing fails. Valid inputs are exactly those accepted by {@link

   * identically to this converter.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning: do not depend</b> on the behavior of this method.
   *
   * <p>Historically, {@code Converter} instances in this library have implemented this method to
   * recognize certain cases where distinct {@code Converter} instances would in fact behave
   * identically. However, this is not true of {@code Converter} implementations in general. It is
   * best not to depend on it.
   */