have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.escape.Escape" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />

### Das Problem verstehen { #understand-the-problem }

* Stellen Sie zunächst sicher, dass Sie **das Problem verstehen**, welches der Pull Request zu lösen versucht. Möglicherweise gibt es eine längere Diskussion dazu in einer GitHub-Diskussion oder einem GitHub-Issue.

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.collect.Collect" />

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.collect.Collect" />

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.collect.Collect" />

                    totalProblems, (totalProblems == 1) ? "problem was" : "problems were"));

            if (context.options().showErrors().orElse(false)) {
                for (BuilderProblem problem :
                        toolchainsResult.getProblems().problems().toList()) {
                    context.logger.warn(problem.getMessage() + " @ " + problem.getLocation());
                }
            }

                validateStringNotEmpty(problems, "mirrors.mirror.id", mirror.getId(), mirror.getUrl());

                validateBannedCharacters(
                        problems, "mirrors.mirror.id", Severity.WARNING, mirror.getId(), null, ILLEGAL_REPO_ID_CHARS);

                if ("local".equals(mirror.getId())) {
                    addViolation(
                            problems,
                            Severity.WARNING,

 files for the current project. if yes. then I'm able to find projects that
 can be offered to be opened together with the current project.
 problems with the current solution are:
 1. information is duplicate. once in POM's dependencies and once in the
 maven.multiproject.includes property.
 2. it works without problems only for projects with relative paths, e.g., from
 one CVS repository.. for projects from multiple SCM repositories it's harder

     *
     * @param severity the severity level to get problems for
     * @return a stream of problems with the specified severity
     */
    @Nonnull
    Stream<P> problems(BuilderProblem.Severity severity);

    /**
     * Creates an "empty" problem collector that doesn't store any problems.
     *
     * @param <P> the type of problem
     * @return an empty problem collector
     */
    @Nonnull