/**
 * A test which demonstrates maven's recursive inheritance where
 * a distinct value is taken from each parent contributing to
 * the final model of the project being assembled. There is no
 * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test:
 * each model in the lineage is providing a value that is not present
 * anywhere else in the lineage. We are just making sure that values

 * <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingSortedSet} forward <i>indiscriminately</i> to
 * the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add} alone <i>will not</i> change
 * the behavior of {@link #addAll}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should

    public void addProfile(Profile profile) {
        String profileId = profile.getId();

        Profile existing = profilesById.get(profileId);
        if (existing != null) {
            logger.warn("Overriding profile: '" + profileId + "' (source: " + existing.getSource()
                    + ") with new instance from source: " + profile.getSource());
        }

        profilesById.put(profile.getId(), profile);

    super(new EnumMap<K, V>(keyType), new HashMap<V, K>());
    // TODO: cpovirk - Pre-size the HashMap based on the number of enum values?
    this.keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl = keyType;
  }

  // Overriding these 3 methods to show that values may be null (but not keys)

  @Override
  K checkKey(K key) {
    return checkNotNull(key);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override

* Put that data in a Pydantic model.
* Generate a `dict` without default values from the input model (using `exclude_unset`).
    * This way you can update only the values actually set by the user, instead of overriding values already stored with default values in your model.
* Create a copy of the stored model, updating its attributes with the received partial updates (using the `update` parameter).

 * implementation can be created easily by extending this class and implementing the {@link
 * Multiset#entrySet()} method, plus optionally overriding {@link #add(Object, int)} and {@link
 * #remove(Object, int)} to enable modifications to the multiset.
 *
 * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by

 * <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingSortedMap} forward <i>indiscriminately</i> to
 * the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #put} alone <i>will not</i> change
 * the behavior of {@link #putAll}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingSortedMultiset} forward
 * <b>indiscriminately</b> to the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link
 * #add(Object, int)} alone <b>will not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can
 * lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well,

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingList} forward <b>indiscriminately</b> to the
 * methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add} alone <b>will not</b> change the
 * behavior of {@link #addAll}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should

 * implementation can be created easily by extending this class and implementing the {@link
 * Multiset#entrySet()} method, plus optionally overriding {@link #add(Object, int)} and {@link
 * #remove(Object, int)} to enable modifications to the multiset.
 *
 * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by