* identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["header", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus",
        }
    ]
}
```

## 요약

        assertEquals(0, result.size());
    }

    // Test reload with empty inputs
    public void test_reload_emptyInputs() throws Exception {
        writeTestFile(" => output\n");

        PagingList<CharMappingItem> result = charMappingFile.selectList(0, 10);
        // An entry with empty input is created (split of empty string creates array with one empty element)
        assertEquals(1, result.size());

`extra` 필드가 허용되지 않는다는 오류 응답을 받게 됩니다:

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["body", "extra"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "Mr. Poopybutthole"
        }
    ]
}
```

## 요약

```

他們將收到一個**錯誤**回應，告訴他們查詢參數 `tool` 是不允許的：

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["query", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus"
        }
    ]
}
```

## 總結

你可以使用 **Pydantic 模型**在 **FastAPI** 中聲明**查詢參數**。😎

/// tip

劇透警告：你也可以使用 Pydantic 模型來聲明 cookie 和 headers，但你將在本教學的後面部分閱讀到這部分內容。🤫

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["cookie", "santa_tracker"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "good-list-please",
        }
    ]
}
```

## Підсумок

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */

        // Arrange: choose a small set of known DOS codes
        List<Integer> inputs = Arrays.asList(0x00000000, 0x00050001, 0x007b0001, 0x0BADF00D);
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        BiConsumer<Integer, Integer> consumer = mock(BiConsumer.class);

        // Act: for each input, if a mapping exists, notify the consumer
        for (int dos : inputs) {
            int nt = findNtStatusOrMinusOne(dos);
            if (nt != -1) {

				"us-west-1",
				"s3",
				"ABCD"),
			expectedCredentials: credentialHeader{},
			expectedErrCode:     ErrInvalidRequestVersion,
		},
		// Test Case - 9.
		// Test case with right inputs. Expected to return a valid CredentialHeader.
		// "aws4_request" is the valid request version.
		{
			inputCredentialStr: generateCredentialStr(
				"Z7IXGOO6BZ0REAN1Q26I",
				sampleTimeStr,
				"us-west-1",

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["header", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus",
        }
    ]
}
```

## Resumen