t = t.UTC() // Convert to UTC for compatibility
	h.Modified = t
	h.ModifiedDate, h.ModifiedTime = timeToMsDosTime(t)
}

const (
	// Unix constants. The specification doesn't mention them,
	// but these seem to be the values agreed on by tools.
	s_IFMT   = 0xf000
	s_IFSOCK = 0xc000
	s_IFLNK  = 0xa000
	s_IFREG  = 0x8000
	s_IFBLK  = 0x6000
	s_IFDIR  = 0x4000
	s_IFCHR  = 0x2000

            // If any exception occurs, it should be a DictionaryException
            assertTrue("Exception should be DictionaryException", e instanceof DictionaryException);
            assertTrue("Message should mention userDict file",
                    e.getMessage().contains("userDict") || e.getMessage().contains("Failed to write"));
        } finally {
            // Ensure proper cleanup
            if (updater != null) {

         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's
         * unlikely that cancel() will be slow, so we can probably get away with calling it while

    // There are several well-known algorithms for rotating part of an array (or, equivalently,
    // exchanging two blocks of memory). This classic text by Gries and Mills mentions several:
    // https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/6292/81-452.pdf.
    // (1) "Reversal", the one we have here.
    // (2) "Dolphin". If we're rotating an array a of size n by a distance of d, then element a[0]

        version is LLVM/clang 17. The official Wheels-published on PyPI will be
        based on Clang; however, users retain the option to build wheels using
        the MSVC compiler following the steps mentioned in
        https://www.tensorflow.org/install/source_windows as has been the case
        before

### Breaking Changes

*   `tf.summary.trace_on` now takes a `profiler_outdir` argument. This must be

         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's
         * unlikely that cancel() will be slow, so we can probably get away with calling it while

		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},
	ErrInvalidCopySource: {
		Code:           "InvalidArgument",
		Description:    "Copy Source must mention the source bucket and key: sourcebucket/sourcekey.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},
	ErrInvalidMetadataDirective: {
		Code:           "InvalidArgument",
		Description:    "Unknown metadata directive.",

replaced by shifting the virtual window we operate // over: T of the algorithm is T[i:] for us. That means that T1 in // Step 2 (T mod 2^_W) is simply T[i]. k0 in Step 3 is our m0inv. Y := T[i] * m.m0inv // Step 4 and 5 add Y × m to T, which as mentioned above is stored // at T[i:]. The two carries (from a × d and Y × m) are added up in // the next word T[n+i], and the carry bit from that addition is // brought forward to the next iteration. c2 := addMulVVW(T[i:n+i], mLimbs, Y) T[n+i], c = bits.Add(c1,...

* fix --save-config in create subcommand ([#40289](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40289), [@xilabao](https://github.com/xilabao))
* We should mention the caveats of in-place upgrade in release note. ([#40727](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40727), [@Random-Liu](https://github.com/Random-Liu))

- Clarified the description of a test in the e2e suite that mentions "SCTP" but is
  actually intended to be testing the behavior of network plugins that don't
  implement SCTP. ([#102509](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/102509), [@danwinship](https://github.com/danwinship))