* {@code equals} would break symmetry, as the forwarding object might consider itself equal to the
 * object being tested, but the reverse could not be true. This behavior is consistent with the
 * JDK's collection wrappers, such as {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableCollection}. Use an
 * interface-specific subclass of {@code ForwardingObject}, such as {@link ForwardingList}, to

   *       traffic to {@code charlie}, rather than letting {@code bravo} keep its traffic.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>See the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_hashing">Wikipedia article on
   * consistent hashing</a> for more information.
   */
  public static int consistentHash(HashCode hashCode, int buckets) {
    return consistentHash(hashCode.padToLong(), buckets);
  }

  /**

            // from being reused. Otherwise we're still obligated to transmit the request body to
            // leave the connection in a consistent state.
            exchange.noNewExchangesOnConnection()
          }
        }
      } else if (!isUpgradeRequest) {
        exchange.noRequestBody()
      }

       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the
       * removal of a feature.
       *
       * Fortunately, exceptions rarely contain references to expensive resources.
       */

        String result = crawlerEngineClient.toString();
        assertNotNull(result);
    }

    // Test hashCode method
    public void test_hashCode() {
        // Test that hashCode returns consistent value
        int hashCode1 = crawlerEngineClient.hashCode();
        int hashCode2 = crawlerEngineClient.hashCode();
        assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
    }

    // Test equals method

 * {@code equals} would break symmetry, as the forwarding object might consider itself equal to the
 * object being tested, but the reverse could not be true. This behavior is consistent with the
 * JDK's collection wrappers, such as {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableCollection}. Use an
 * interface-specific subclass of {@code ForwardingObject}, such as {@link ForwardingList}, to

     */
    public boolean isDeleted() {
        return isUpdated() && newInputs.length == 0;
    }

    /**
     * Sorts both the current inputs and new inputs arrays in place.
     * This ensures consistent ordering for comparison and equality operations.
     */
    public void sort() {
        if (inputs != null) {
            Arrays.sort(inputs);
        }
        if (newInputs != null) {

import javax.net.ssl.SSLException
import javax.net.ssl.SSLSession
import okhttp3.internal.canParseAsIpAddress
import okhttp3.internal.toCanonicalHost
import okio.utf8Size

/**
 * A HostnameVerifier consistent with [RFC 2818][rfc_2818].
 *
 * [rfc_2818]: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt
 */
@Suppress("NAME_SHADOWING")
object OkHostnameVerifier : HostnameVerifier {
  private const val ALT_DNS_NAME = 2

 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as the entry of a {@code SortedMap} whose
 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman

        assertFalse(exception1.equals(exception2));
        assertTrue(exception1.equals(exception1));
    }

    public void test_hashCode() {
        // Test hashCode consistency
        DictionaryExpiredException exception = new DictionaryExpiredException();
        int hashCode1 = exception.hashCode();
        int hashCode2 = exception.hashCode();

        assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);