rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.
-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.

 * </ol>
 * <p>By understanding and properly configuring repositories, developers can control where Maven looks for dependencies, manage access to proprietary artifacts, and optimize the build process to ensure consistency and reliability across projects.
 * </p>
 *
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @see Repository
 * @see LocalRepository

 * </ol>
 * By understanding and properly configuring repositories, developers can control where Maven looks for dependencies, manage access to proprietary artifacts, and optimize the build process to ensure consistency and reliability across projects.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @see RemoteRepository
 * @see LocalRepository
 */

                                        <la:link href="/admin/dict"
                                                 styleClass="btn btn-default btn-xs">
                                            <em class="fa fa-book">
                                            <la:message key="labels.dict_list_link"/>
                                        </la:link>
                                        <la:link href="../list/0/?dictId=${f:u(dictId)}"

                                        <la:link href="/admin/dict"
                                                 styleClass="btn btn-default btn-xs">
                                            <em class="fa fa-book">
                                            <la:message key="labels.dict_list_link"/>
                                        </la:link>
                                        <la:link href="../list/0/?dictId=${f:u(dictId)}"

                                <div class="btn-group">
                                    <la:link href="/admin/dict" styleClass="btn btn-default btn-xs">
                                        <em class="fa fa-book">
                                        <la:message key="labels.dict_list_link"/>
                                    </la:link>
                                    <la:link href="list/1?dictId=${f:u(dictId)}"

                                        <la:link href="/admin/dict"
                                                 styleClass="btn btn-default btn-xs">
                                            <em class="fa fa-book">
                                            <la:message key="labels.dict_list_link"/>
                                        </la:link>
                                        <la:link href="../list/0/?dictId=${f:u(dictId)}"

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestClassToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})

                                        <la:link href="/admin/dict"
                                                 styleClass="btn btn-default btn-xs">
                                            <em class="fa fa-book">
                                            <la:message key="labels.dict_list_link"/>
                                        </la:link>
                                        <la:link href="../list/0/?dictId=${f:u(dictId)}"

* The "admonition" sections, like `tip`, `info`, etc. are not changed or translated. For example:

```
/// tip

This is a tip.

///

```

looks like this:

/// tip

This is a tip.

///

...it could be translated as:

```
/// tip

Esto es un consejo.

///

```