* collection-based APIs. Further, this method allows precise control over the runtime type of the
   * output array, and may, under certain circumstances, be used to save allocation costs.
   *
   * <p>Suppose {@code x} is a queue known to contain only strings. The following code can be used
   * to dump the queue into a newly allocated array of {@code String}:
   *
   * <pre>

   * collection-based APIs. Further, this method allows precise control over the runtime type of the
   * output array, and may, under certain circumstances, be used to save allocation costs.
   *
   * <p>Suppose {@code x} is a queue known to contain only strings. The following code can be used
   * to dump the queue into a newly allocated array of {@code String}:
   *
   * <pre>

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Chars.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(char[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {

@Test
public void testRdmaBufferManager() throws Exception {
    RdmaProvider provider = new TcpRdmaProvider();  // Use TCP for testing
    RdmaBufferManager manager = new RdmaBufferManager(provider);
    
    // Test buffer allocation
    RdmaMemoryRegion region = manager.getSendRegion(1024);
    assertNotNull(region);
    assertTrue(region.getSize() >= 1024);
    
    // Test buffer release
    manager.releaseSendRegion(region);
    

    //
    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(AdminMaintenanceAction.class);

    private static final String[] CAT_NAMES =
            { "aliases", "allocation", "count", "fielddata", "health", "indices", "master", "nodeattrs", "nodes", "pending_tasks",
                    "plugins", "recovery", "repositories", "thread_pool", "shards", "segments", "snapshots", "templates" };

  - [Changelog since v1.33.1](#changelog-since-v1331)
  - [Important Security Information](#important-security-information-1)
    - [CVE-2025-4563: Nodes can bypass dynamic resource allocation authorization checks](#cve-2025-4563-nodes-can-bypass-dynamic-resource-allocation-authorization-checks)
  - [Changes by Kind](#changes-by-kind-2)
    - [Feature](#feature-1)
    - [Bug or Regression](#bug-or-regression-2)

restarts. More information [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20995)
  * Pod IP allocation-related issues. Deleting the docker checkpoint prior to
restarting the daemon alleviates this issue, but hasn’t been verified to
completely eliminate the IP allocation issue. More information [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/21523#issuecomment-191498969)

  - [Changelog since v1.32.5](#changelog-since-v1325)
  - [Important Security Information](#important-security-information-1)
    - [CVE-2025-4563: Nodes can bypass dynamic resource allocation authorization checks](#cve-2025-4563-nodes-can-bypass-dynamic-resource-allocation-authorization-checks)
  - [Changes by Kind](#changes-by-kind-2)
    - [Feature](#feature-1)
    - [Bug or Regression](#bug-or-regression-2)