The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

                        ImmutableSetMultimap.of("foo", 314, "one", 159, "two", 265, "bar", 358);
                    multimap.putAll(badEntries);
                    multimap =
                        Multimaps.filterEntries(
                            multimap,
                            not(Predicates.in(ImmutableMap.of("one", 159, "two", 265).entrySet())));

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

object WebSocketProtocol {
  /** Magic value which must be appended to the key in a response header. */
  internal const val ACCEPT_MAGIC = "258EAFA5-E914-47DA-95CA-C5AB0DC85B11"

  /*
  Each frame starts with two bytes of data.

   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
  +-+-+-+-+-------+  +-+-------------+
  |F|R|R|R| OP    |  |M| LENGTH      |
  |I|S|S|S| CODE  |  |A|             |
  |N|V|V|V|       |  |S|             |

import org.opentest4j.TestAbortedException

/**
 * This test binds two different web servers (IPv4 and IPv6) to the same port, but on different
 * local IP addresses. Requests made to `127.0.0.1` will reach the IPv4 server, and requests made to
 * `::1` will reach the IPv6 server.
 *
 * By orchestrating two different servers with the same port but different IP addresses, we can

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

  /**
   * Returns the smallest power of two greater than or equal to {@code x}. This is equivalent to
   * {@code checkedPow(2, log2(x, CEILING))}.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code x <= 0}
   * @throws ArithmeticException of the next-higher power of two is not representable as a {@code
   *     long}, i.e. when {@code x > 2^62}
   * @since 20.0
   */

    assertFalse(Objects.equal("foo", "bar"));
    assertFalse(Objects.equal("1", 1));
  }

  public void testHashCode() throws Exception {
    int h1 = Objects.hashCode(1, "two", 3.0);
    int h2 = Objects.hashCode(Integer.valueOf(1), new String("two"), Double.valueOf(3.0));
    // repeatable
    assertEquals(h1, h2);

    // These don't strictly need to be true, but they're nice properties.