* helps to shortcut most calls to isEmpty(), which is important because the check for emptiness
     * is relatively expensive. Use a subtype so this also doesn't need any extra storage.
     */
    private static final class UnconditionalValueHolder extends ValueHolder {}
  }

  private MoreObjects() {}

        List<RecursiveTypeBoundBugExample<? extends RecursiveTypeBoundBugExample<T>>> arg) {
      return notSubtype(arg); // isSubtype() currently incorrectly considers it a subtype.
    }
  }

  private static class WildcardSubtypingTests extends SubtypeTester {
    @TestSubtype(suppressGetSupertype = true, suppressGetSubtype = true)
    public Iterable<?> noBounds(List<?> list) {

      void visitClass(Class<?> t) {
        result.set(t.getComponentType());
      }
    }.visit(type);
    return result.get();
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code ? extends X} if any of {@code bounds} is a subtype of {@code X[]}; or null
   * otherwise.
   */
  @CheckForNull
  private static Type subtypeOfComponentType(Type[] bounds) {
    for (Type bound : bounds) {
      Type componentType = getComponentType(bound);

   * restrictive. However, the ideal signature, {@code public <S super T> S or(S)}, is not legal
   * Java. As a result, some sensible operations involving subtypes are compile errors:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * Optional<Integer> optionalInt = getSomeOptionalInt();
   * Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // error
   *

    setImplementation(ThreadFactory.class, Dummies.DummyThreadFactory.class);
    setImplementation(Executor.class, Dummies.DummyExecutor.class);
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // it's a subtype map
  private static <T> @Nullable Class<? extends T> getImplementation(Class<T> type) {
    return (Class<? extends T>) implementations.get(type);
  }

   * @throws NullPointerException if any of {@code elements} is null
   */
  public static <E> ImmutableSortedMultiset<E> copyOf(Iterable<? extends E> elements) {
    // Hack around E not being a subtype of Comparable.
    // Unsafe, see ImmutableSortedMultisetFauxverideShim.
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    Ordering<E> naturalOrder = (Ordering<E>) Ordering.<Comparable<?>>natural();

    setImplementation(ThreadFactory.class, Dummies.DummyThreadFactory.class);
    setImplementation(Executor.class, Dummies.DummyExecutor.class);
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // it's a subtype map
  private static <T> @Nullable Class<? extends T> getImplementation(Class<T> type) {
    return (Class<? extends T>) implementations.get(type);
  }

          // subtyping between declared type bound and actual type bound. So it's possible that we
          // may generate something like <capture#1-of ? extends Foo&SubFoo>.
          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.
          // There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.

    val mediaType: MediaType = "".toMediaType()
    val defaultCharset: Charset? = mediaType.charset()
    val charset: Charset? = mediaType.charset(Charsets.UTF_8)
    val type: String = mediaType.type
    val subtype: String = mediaType.subtype
    val parse: MediaType? = "".toMediaTypeOrNull()
  }

  @Test
  fun mockResponse() {
    var mockResponse: MockResponse = MockResponse()
    var status: String = mockResponse.status

 * GraphBuilder} class:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MutableGraph<Integer> graph = GraphBuilder.undirected().build();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>{@link GraphBuilder#build()} returns an instance of {@link MutableGraph}, which is a subtype
 * of {@code Graph} that provides methods for adding and removing nodes and edges. If you do not
 * need to mutate a graph (e.g. if you write a method than runs a read-only algorithm on the graph),