disjoint = new Target(disjointList, "disjoint");
    superset = new Target(MinimalCollection.of(e0(), e1(), e2(), e3(), e4()), "superset");
    nonEmptyProperSubset = new Target(MinimalCollection.of(e1()), "subset");
    sameElements = new Target(asList(createSamplesArray()), "sameElements");
    containsDuplicates =
        new Target(MinimalCollection.of(e0(), e0(), e3(), e3()), "containsDuplicates");

 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

    return forward.tailSet(toElement, inclusive).descendingSet();
  }

  @Override
  ImmutableSortedSet<E> subSetImpl(
      E fromElement, boolean fromInclusive, E toElement, boolean toInclusive) {
    return forward.subSet(toElement, toInclusive, fromElement, fromInclusive).descendingSet();
  }

  @Override
  ImmutableSortedSet<E> tailSetImpl(E fromElement, boolean inclusive) {
    return forward.headSet(fromElement, inclusive).descendingSet();

# or to provide custom queries or build logic.
name: "CodeQL"

on:
  push:
    branches: [master]
  pull_request:
    # The branches below must be a subset of the branches above
    branches: [master]
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 9 * * 3'

jobs:
  analyze:
    name: Analyze
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:

# or to provide custom queries or build logic.
name: "CodeQL"

on:
  push:
    branches: [master]
  pull_request:
    # The branches below must be a subset of the branches above
    branches: [master]
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 11 * * 4'

jobs:
  analyze:
    name: Analyze
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:

        "containsAll(empty) should return true", collection.containsAll(MinimalCollection.of()));
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  public void testContainsAll_subset() {
    assertTrue(
        "containsAll(subset) should return true",
        collection.containsAll(MinimalCollection.of(e0())));
  }

  public void testContainsAll_sameElements() {
    assertTrue(
        "containsAll(sameElements) should return true",

              <location>https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/</location>
            </offlineLink>
            <!-- The Checker Framework likewise would claim javax.annotations, despite providing only a subset of the JSR305 annotations, so it must likewise come after JSR305. -->
            <offlineLink>
              <url>https://checkerframework.org/api/</url>

purposes only, and you should look to the Redistributor's license for terms and conditions of use. ASM 4.1 The plug-in includes software developed by the ObjectWeb consortium as part of the ASM project at http://asm.ow2.org/ http://asm.ow2.org/. A subset of ASM is re-packaged within the source and binary of the plug-in (org.eclipse.sisu.space.asm.*) to avoid version collisions with other usage and is also available from the plug-in's github repository. Your use of the ASM code is subject to the terms...

      return standardToArray(array);
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return standardToString();
    }

    @Override
    public SortedSet<T> subSet(T fromElement, T toElement) {
      return standardSubSet(fromElement, toElement);
    }
  }

  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

 * but was not itself a public suffix. However, this test is no longer accurate. There are many
 * domains which are both public suffixes and addressable as hosts; {@code "uk.com"} is one example.
 * Using the subset of public suffixes that are {@linkplain #isRegistrySuffix() registry suffixes},
 * one can get a better result, as only a few registry suffixes are addressable. However, the most