)
    # ---------------------
    context.close()
    browser.close()


process = subprocess.Popen(
    ["uvicorn", "docs_src.separate_openapi_schemas.tutorial001:app"]
)
try:
    with sync_playwright() as playwright:
        run(playwright)
finally:

- Primary security coordinator: ******@****.***
- Secondary coordinator: ******@****.***
- If you receive no response: ******@****.***

### Disclosure Process

MinIO uses the following disclosure process:

1. Once the security report is received one member of the security team tries to verify and reproduce
   the issue and determines the impact it has.

```

</div>

////

The only new option here is `--workers` telling Uvicorn to start 4 worker processes.

You can also see that it shows the **PID** of each process, `27365` for the parent process (this is the **process manager**) and one for each worker process: `27368`, `27369`, `27370`, and `27367`.

## Deployment Concepts { #deployment-concepts }

     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Started server process <b>[</b><font color="#34E2E2"><b>27368</b></font><b>]</b>
     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Started server process <b>[</b><font color="#34E2E2"><b>27369</b></font><b>]</b>

        private BlockingExchange(TransferEvent event) {
            super(event);
        }

        @Override
        public void process(Consumer<TransferEvent> consumer) {
            super.process(consumer);
            latch.countDown();
        }

        @Override
        public void waitForProcessed() throws InterruptedException {
            latch.await();
        }

            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Failed to process a scroll request.", e);
            }
            writeJsonResponse(HttpServletResponse.SC_BAD_REQUEST, e);
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Failed to process a scroll request.", e);
            }

This is still true.

So, to be able to have **multiple processes** at the same time, there has to be a **single process listening on a port** that then transmits the communication to each worker process in some way.

### Memory per Process { #memory-per-process }

                    } else {
                        logger.warn("Failed to process a task.", e);
                    }
                }
                if (task.isPermanent()) {
                    task.restart();
                }
            });
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            logger.warn("Failed to process a task.", e);
        }
    }

    private synchronized boolean isInterrupted() {

    }

    /**
     * Traverses resources contained in the file system.
     *
     * @param rootDir the root directory (must not be {@literal null})
     * @param handler the handler to process resources (must not be {@literal null})
     */
    public static void forEach(final File rootDir, final ResourceHandler handler) {
        assertArgumentNotNull("rootDir", rootDir);

        } catch (final Exception e) {
            logger.warn("Failed to load path mappings.", e);
        }
        return 0;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the list of process types.
     *
     * @return the list of process types
     */
    protected List<String> getProcessTypeList() {
        final List<String> ptList = new ArrayList<>();
        final String executeType = System.getProperty("lasta.env");