.put("concurrencyLevel", new ConcurrencyLevelParser())
          .put("weakKeys", new KeyStrengthParser(Strength.WEAK))
          .put("softValues", new ValueStrengthParser(Strength.SOFT))
          .put("weakValues", new ValueStrengthParser(Strength.WEAK))
          .put("recordStats", new RecordStatsParser())
          .put("expireAfterAccess", new AccessDurationParser())

          .put("concurrencyLevel", new ConcurrencyLevelParser())
          .put("weakKeys", new KeyStrengthParser(Strength.WEAK))
          .put("softValues", new ValueStrengthParser(Strength.SOFT))
          .put("weakValues", new ValueStrengthParser(Strength.WEAK))
          .put("recordStats", new RecordStatsParser())
          .put("expireAfterAccess", new AccessDurationParser())

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import static com.google.common.collect.MapMakerInternalMap.Strength.STRONG;
import static com.google.common.collect.MapMakerInternalMap.Strength.WEAK;
import static com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester.reserialize;
import static com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;

    } while (inflater.bytesRead < totalBytesToRead && !inflater.finished())

    // The inflater data was self-terminated and there's unexpected trailing data. Tear it all down
    // so we don't leak that data into the input of the next message.
    if (inflater.bytesRead < totalBytesToRead) {
      deflatedBytes.clear()
      inflaterSource.close()
      this.inflaterSource = null
      this.inflater = null
    }

      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the

    // This is trickier than expected. We plan to put 15 values in each of these (WARMUP_MIN to
    // WARMUP_MAX), but the tests assume no values get evicted. Even with a maximumSize of 100, one
    // of the values gets evicted. With weak keys, we use identity equality, which means using
    // System.identityHashCode, which means the assignment of keys to segments is nondeterministic,

}


class IntegrationTestFixtureVisitor : AbstractAstVisitor() {

    /**
     * Determines if the class is an integration test. It's a bit weak, but we cannot
     * rely on the class node analysis since it doesn't give the right superclass because
     * resolution is not complete when this visitor is executed.
     */
    private

pkg time, method (Time) AppendBinary([]uint8) ([]uint8, error) #62384
pkg time, method (Time) AppendText([]uint8) ([]uint8, error) #62384
pkg weak, func Make[$0 interface{}](*$0) Pointer[$0] #67552
pkg weak, method (Pointer[$0]) Value() *$0 #67552

 * <p>
 * Unlike {@link org.apache.maven.execution.MojoExecutionListener}, this extension point does not
 * trigger instantiation of the component, hence "weak" class name prefix. Only applies to mojo execution
 * scoped components.
 * </p>
 * <strong>Note:</strong> This interface is part of work in progress and can be changed or removed without notice.
 *

import org.codenarc.rule.AbstractAstVisitor;
import org.codenarc.util.AstUtil;

public class IntegrationTestFixtureVisitor extends AbstractAstVisitor {

    /**
     * Determines if the class is an integration test. It's a bit weak, but we cannot
     * rely on the class node analysis since it doesn't give the right superclass because
     * resolution is not complete when this visitor is executed.
     */