*
 * <p>This authenticator enables Single Sign-On (SSO) using SAML 2.0 protocol
 * with Identity Providers such as Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin, etc.</p>
 *
 * <h2>Required Configuration</h2>
 * <p>Add the following properties to {@code system.properties}:</p>
 * <pre>
 * # Enable SAML SSO
 * sso.type=saml
 *
 * # Identity Provider settings (obtain from your IdP)
 * saml.idp.entityid=http://www.okta.com/xxxxx

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * An interface for <a
 * href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_(discrete_mathematics)">graph</a>-structured data,
 * whose edges are anonymous entities with no identity or information of their own.
 *
 * <p>A graph is composed of a set of nodes and a set of edges connecting pairs of nodes.
 *
 * <p>There are three primary interfaces provided to represent graphs. In order of increasing

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * An interface for <a
 * href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_(discrete_mathematics)">graph</a>-structured data,
 * whose edges are anonymous entities with no identity or information of their own.
 *
 * <p>A graph is composed of a set of nodes and a set of edges connecting pairs of nodes.
 *
 * <p>There are three primary interfaces provided to represent graphs. In order of increasing

    .build();
```

Client Authentication
---------------------

The above scenario is representative of most TLS set ups: the client uses certificates to validate
the identity of a server. The converse is also possible. Here we create a server that authenticates
a client and a client that authenticates a server.

```java

        }
    }

    private SimpleProblemCollector validate(String pom) throws Exception {
        return validateEffective(pom, UnaryOperator.identity());
    }

    private SimpleProblemCollector validateRaw(String pom) throws Exception {
        return validateRaw(pom, UnaryOperator.identity());
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("SameParameterValue")

      // it. To preserve FIFO order and failure atomicity of rejected execution when the same
      // Runnable is executed more than once, allocate a wrapper that we know is safe to remove by
      // object identity.
      // A data structure that returned a removal handle from add() would allow eliminating this
      // allocation.
      submittedTask =
          new Runnable() {
            @Override

      // it. To preserve FIFO order and failure atomicity of rejected execution when the same
      // Runnable is executed more than once, allocate a wrapper that we know is safe to remove by
      // object identity.
      // A data structure that returned a removal handle from add() would allow eliminating this
      // allocation.
      submittedTask =
          new Runnable() {
            @Override

            <type>RepositoryPolicy</type>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
      <!-- prevent Modello generation of an incorrect equals method. Could be avoided by using <identity/> tags to mark ID as the only identity field -->
      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>
          <version>1.0.0/1.1.0</version>
          <code>
            <![CDATA[
    /**

  public void testNotInterfaceType() {
    assertThrows(
        IllegalArgumentException.class,
        () ->
            new ForwardingWrapperTester()
                .testForwarding(String.class, Functions.<String>identity()));
  }

  public void testNulls() {
    new NullPointerTester()
        .setDefault(Class.class, Runnable.class)
        .testAllPublicInstanceMethods(new ForwardingWrapperTester());
  }

  }

  /**
   * Returns an arbitrary ordering over all objects, for which {@code compare(a, b) == 0} implies
   * {@code a == b} (identity equality). There is no meaning whatsoever to the order imposed, but it
   * is constant for the life of the VM.
   *
   * <p>Because the ordering is identity-based, it is not "consistent with {@link
   * Object#equals(Object)}" as defined by {@link Comparator}. Use caution when building a {@link