ImmutableSet.of(1, 2, 3),
        set.intersection(ContiguousSet.create(Range.open(-1, 4), integers())));
    assertEquals(
        ImmutableSet.of(3), set.intersection(ContiguousSet.create(Range.closed(3, 5), integers())));
  }

  public void testAsList() {
    ImmutableList<Integer> list = ContiguousSet.create(Range.closed(1, 3), integers()).asList();
    for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {

///

#### 默认值字段有实际值的数据

但是，如果你的数据在具有默认值的模型字段中有实际的值，例如 ID 为 `bar` 的项：

```Python hl_lines="3  5"
{
    "name": "Bar",
    "description": "The bartenders",
    "price": 62,
    "tax": 20.2
}
```

这些值将包含在响应中。

#### 具有与默认值相同值的数据

如果数据具有与默认值相同的值，例如 ID 为 `baz` 的项：

            /* out of phase maybe? */
            /* inch forward 1 byte and try again */
            for (int i = 0; i < 35; i++) {
                sbuf[i] = sbuf[i + 1];
            }
            int b;
            if ((b = in.read()) == -1) {
                return null;
            }
            sbuf[35] = (byte) b;
        }

        key.mid = Encdec.dec_uint16le(sbuf, 34) & 0xFFFF;

	_ = x[ErrMalformedXML-29]
	_ = x[ErrMissingContentLength-30]
	_ = x[ErrMissingContentMD5-31]
	_ = x[ErrMissingRequestBodyError-32]
	_ = x[ErrMissingSecurityHeader-33]
	_ = x[ErrNoSuchBucket-34]
	_ = x[ErrNoSuchBucketPolicy-35]
	_ = x[ErrNoSuchBucketLifecycle-36]
	_ = x[ErrNoSuchLifecycleConfiguration-37]
	_ = x[ErrInvalidLifecycleWithObjectLock-38]
	_ = x[ErrNoSuchBucketSSEConfig-39]
	_ = x[ErrNoSuchCORSConfiguration-40]

예를 들면, 위의 이 모델은 JSON "`object`" (혹은 파이썬 `dict`)을 다음과 같이 선언합니다:

```JSON
{
    "name": "Foo",
    "description": "선택적인 설명란",
    "price": 45.2,
    "tax": 3.5
}
```

...`description`과 `tax`는 (기본 값이 `None`으로 되어 있어) 선택적이기 때문에, 이 JSON "`object`"는 다음과 같은 상황에서도 유효합니다:

```JSON
{
    "name": "Foo",
    "price": 45.2
}
```

## 매개변수로서 선언하기

/// info | Информация

К сожалению, я не могу просто доверять PR-ам только потому, что у них есть несколько одобрений.

Несколько раз было так, что у PR-ов было 3, 5 или больше одобрений, вероятно из-за привлекательного описания, но когда я их проверял, они оказывались сломанными, содержали баги или вовсе не решали заявленную проблему. 😅

pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTENT = 33
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTENT R_390
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTOFF16 = 34
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTOFF16 R_390
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTOFF32 = 35
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTOFF32 R_390
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTOFF64 = 36
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_GOTPLTOFF64 R_390
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_JMP_SLOT = 11
pkg debug/elf, const R_390_JMP_SLOT R_390

    ).singleFile
    tasks.withType<Test> {
      jvmArgs("-Xbootclasspath/p:${alpnBootJar}")
    }
  }
}

android {
  compileSdk = 35

  namespace = "okhttp.okhttp3"

  defaultConfig {
    minSdk = 21

    consumerProguardFiles("okhttp3.pro")
  }

  testOptions {
    unitTests {
      isIncludeAndroidResources = true

      ImmutableList.of(
          ImmutableList.<Integer>of(),
          ImmutableList.of(1),
          ImmutableList.of(2),
          ImmutableList.of(2, 3),
          ImmutableList.of(1, 2),
          ImmutableList.of(3, 5),
          ImmutableList.of(2, 4),
          ImmutableList.of(1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9));

  /*
   * We have a whole series of abstract test classes that "stack", so e.g. the tests for filtered

                        TestCoverage(8, TestType.SOAK, Os.LINUX, JvmCategory.MAX_LTS_VERSION, 1),
                        TestCoverage(9, TestType.SOAK, Os.WINDOWS, JvmCategory.MIN_VERSION, 1),
                        TestCoverage(35, TestType.SOAK, Os.MACOS, JvmCategory.MAX_LTS_VERSION, 1, arch = Arch.AARCH64),
                        TestCoverage(
                            10,
                            TestType.ALL_VERSIONS_CROSS_VERSION,