## Changes since v1.1.1

### Major Themes

  * <strong>Significant scale improvements</strong>. Increased cluster scale by 400% to 1000 nodes with 30,000 pods per cluster.
Kubelet supports 100 pods per node with 4x reduced system overhead.
  * <strong>Simplified application deployment and management. </strong>
     * Dynamic Configuration (ConfigMap API in the core API group) enables application

    testRotate(new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, 6, new int[] {5, 1, 2, 3, 4});
  }

  public void testRotateIndexed() {
    testRotate(new int[] {}, 0, 0, 0, new int[] {});

    testRotate(new int[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new int[] {1});
    testRotate(new int[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new int[] {1});
    testRotate(new int[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new int[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is

     * The maximum amount of time after the client calls [close] to wait for a graceful shutdown. If
     * the server doesn't respond the web socket will be canceled.
     */
    const val CANCEL_AFTER_CLOSE_MILLIS = 60L * 1000

    /**
     * The smallest message that will be compressed. We use 1024 because smaller messages already
     * fit comfortably within a single ethernet packet (1500 bytes) even with framing overhead.
     *

   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {
      ImmutableDoubleArray.Builder builder = ImmutableDoubleArray.builder(random.nextInt(20));
      AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);
      while (counter.get() < 1000) {
        BuilderOp op = BuilderOp.randomOp();
        op.doIt(builder, counter);
      }

RegExp(j)),null===e)return!1;var m=function(b,c,d){for(var e=0;e<c.length;e++)if(c[e].substring(0,1)===b)return a.formUtils.parseDateInt(d[e+1]);return-1};return g=m("m",k,e),f=m("d",k,e),h=m("y",k,e),!(2===g&&f>28&&(h%4!==0||h%100===0&&h%400!==0)||2===g&&f>29&&(h%4===0||h%100!==0&&h%400===0)||g>12||0===g)&&(!(this.isShortMonth(g)&&f>30||!this.isShortMonth(g)&&f>31||0===f)&&[h,g,f])},parseDateInt:function(a){return 0===a.indexOf("0")&&(a=a.replace("0","")),parseInt(a,10)},isShortMonth:function(a){return...

        Assertions.assertEquals((int) (originalSize * 0.5), highlightInfo.getFragmentSize(), 10);

        highlightInfo = new HighlightInfo();
        viewHelper.updateHighlightInfo(highlightInfo, 1000);
        assertEquals(originalSize, highlightInfo.getFragmentSize());
    }

    @Test
    public void test_updateFileProtocol() {
        ViewHelper viewHelper = new ViewHelper();
        viewHelper.init();

        private final String output;

        public MockInputStreamThread(String output) {
            super(new java.io.ByteArrayInputStream(new byte[0]), java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets.UTF_8, 1000, null);
            this.output = output;
        }

        @Override
        public void start() {
            // Mock implementation
        }

      }
    }
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // DoubleMath.isPowerOfTwo, DoubleMath.log2(double, RoundingMode), StrictMath
  public void testIsPowerOfTwoYes() {
    for (int i = -1074; i <= 1023; i++) {
      assertTrue(DoubleMath.isPowerOfTwo(StrictMath.pow(2.0, i)));
    }
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // DoubleMath.isPowerOfTwo, DoubleMath.log2(double, RoundingMode), StrictMath

 * }
 * }
 *
 * <p>It is important to note that the number of permits requested <i>never</i> affects the
 * throttling of the request itself (an invocation to {@code acquire(1)} and an invocation to {@code
 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be

    assertEquals(80, info.getPort());
    assertEquals(1000, info.getFlags());
  }

  public void testIsatapAddresses() {
    InetAddress ipv4 = InetAddresses.forString("1.2.3.4");
    ImmutableSet<String> validIsatapAddresses =
        ImmutableSet.of(
            "2001:db8::5efe:102:304",
            "2001:db8::100:5efe:102:304", // Private Multicast? Not likely.
            "2001:db8::200:5efe:102:304",