/**
   * This is an extraordinary test case. Here's what it's trying to simulate.
   * - 2 requests happen concurrently to a host that can be coalesced onto a single connection.
   * - Both request discover no existing connection. They both make a connection.
   * - The first request "wins the race".
   * - The second request discovers it "lost the race" and closes the connection it just opened.

        assertEquals("TESTHOST", nbtAddress.getHostName());
        assertArrayEquals(new byte[] { (byte) 192, (byte) 168, (byte) 1, (byte) 1 }, nbtAddress.getAddress());
        // Don't test isGroupAddress and getNodeType here as they don't need context for known hosts
    }

    @Test
    void testConstructorWithAllParameters() throws UnknownHostException {
        // Test the constructor with all parameters

their contributions to Caffe. The project versioning records all such
contribution and copyright details. If a contributor wants to further mark
their specific copyright on a particular contribution, they should indicate
their copyright solely in the commit message of the change when it is
committed.

LICENSE

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without

  private static ImmutableDoubleArray makeArray(Double[] values) {
    return ImmutableDoubleArray.copyOf(Arrays.asList(values));
  }

  // Test generators.  To let the GWT test suite generator access them, they need to be public named
  // classes with a public default constructor (not that we run these suites under GWT yet).

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // used only from suite
  @AndroidIncompatible

  private static ImmutableDoubleArray makeArray(Double[] values) {
    return ImmutableDoubleArray.copyOf(Arrays.asList(values));
  }

  // Test generators.  To let the GWT test suite generator access them, they need to be public named
  // classes with a public default constructor (not that we run these suites under GWT yet).

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // used only from suite
  @AndroidIncompatible

- Fixed a bug in the single-numa-node policy of the TopologyManager.  Previously, pods that only requested CPU resources and did not request any third-party devices would fail to launch with a TopologyAffinity error. Now they will launch successfully. ([#83697](https://github.com/kubernetes/kub...

     * inputs, rather than as if it never tolerates them.
     *
     * We rely on checkers to implement special cases to catch dangerous calls to join(), etc. based
     * on what they know about the particular Joiner instances the calls are performed on.
     *
     * (In addition to useForNull, we also offer skipNulls. It, too, tolerates null inputs, but its

    if ((!features.contains(IteratorFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE) && removes > 1)
        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively
      return;
    }

    MultiExceptionListIterator reference = new MultiExceptionListIterator(expectedElements);

    int bits = LongMath.log2(startingNumber, FLOOR) + 1;
    // Check for the next power of two boundary, to save us a CLZ operation.
    int nextPowerOfTwo = 1 << (bits - 1);

    // Iteratively multiply the longs as big as they can go.
    for (long num = startingNumber; num <= n; num++) {
      // Check to see if the floor(log2(num)) + 1 has changed.
      if ((num & nextPowerOfTwo) != 0) {
        nextPowerOfTwo <<= 1;
        bits++;

   *
   * 1. b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations.
   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as