* b)} is true if and only if {@code equivalence.equivalent(function.apply(a), function.apply(b))}
   * is true.
   *
   * <p>For example:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * Equivalence<Person> SAME_AGE = Equivalence.equals().onResultOf(GET_PERSON_AGE);
   * }
   *
   * <p>{@code function} will never be invoked with a null value.
   *

        /*
         * Verification fails (w/ W2K3 server at least) if status is not 0. This
         * suggests MS doesn't compute the signature (correctly) for error responses
         * (perhaps for DOS reasons).
         */
        /*
         * Looks like the failure case also is just reflecting back the signature we sent
         */

        /**
         * Maybe this is related:
         *

// Get a comma-separated list of op names executed in graph functions dispatched
// to `ctx`. This feature is currently only enabled for TFRT debug builds, for
// performance and simplicity reasons.
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern void TFE_GetExecutedOpNames(TFE_Context* ctx,
                                                  TF_Buffer* buf,
                                                  TF_Status* status);

          service.notifyFailed(t);
          return new FutureAsCancellable(immediateCancelledFuture());
        }
        // We reschedule ourselves with a lock held for two reasons. 1. we want to make sure that
        // cancel calls cancel on the correct future. 2. we want to make sure that the assignment
        // to currentFuture doesn't race with itself so that currentFuture is assigned in the

            <option value="$PROJECT_DIR$/platforms/core-runtime/groovy-loader" />
            <option value="$PROJECT_DIR$/platforms/core-runtime/installation-beacon" />
            <option value="$PROJECT_DIR$/platforms/core-runtime/instrumentation-agent" />
            <option value="$PROJECT_DIR$/platforms/core-runtime/instrumentation-agent-services" />

    changes to be made to PR to pass quality checks and send it back or on a
    rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.
-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested

---

Here's how to help others with questions (in discussions or issues):

### Understand the question { #understand-the-question }

* Check if you can understand what is the **purpose** and use case of the person asking.

* Then check if the question (the vast majority are questions) is **clear**.

      }
    }
  ],
  "data": "asdascasdc1234e123erdasdas"
}`,
		},
		{
			name:       "limit-2",
			query:      `select * from s3object[*].person[*] limit 1`,
			wantResult: `{"Id":1,"Name":"Anshu","Address":"Templestowe","Car":"Jeep"}`,

Les domaines sont vérifiés de manière sécurisée et les certificats sont générés automatiquement. Cela permet également d'automatiser le renouvellement de ces certificats.

<p>
Reads of memory locations larger than a single machine word
are encouraged but not required to meet the same semantics
as word-sized memory locations,
observing a single allowed write <i>w</i>.
For performance reasons,
implementations may instead treat larger operations
as a set of individual machine-word-sized operations
in an unspecified order.
This means that races on multiword data structures