// not supported by Android because the underlying implementation from
    // harmony follows the definition from rfc 1034 page 10 for alternative
    // subject names. This causes the code to drop all alternative subjects.
    assertThat(verifier.verify("bar.com", session)).isTrue()
    assertThat(verifier.verify("a.bar.com", session)).isFalse()

import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Helper classes for various benchmarks.
 *
 * @author Christopher Swenson
 */
@NullUnmarked
final class BenchmarkHelpers {
  /** So far, this is the best way to test various implementations of {@link Set} subclasses. */

        assertEquals(
                new File(pom.getBasedir(), "target/classes"),
                new File(pom.getValue("properties/buildMainOut").toString()));
        assertEquals(
                new File(pom.getBasedir(), "target/test-classes"),
                new File(pom.getValue("properties/buildTestOut").toString()));
        assertEquals(

        this.useNTSmbs = th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_NT_SMBS);
        if (!this.useNTSmbs) {
            log.debug("No support for NT SMBs");
        }

        // there seems to be a bug with some servers that causes corruption if using signatures +
        // CAP_LARGE_WRITE
        if (th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_LARGE_WRITEX) && !th.areSignaturesActive()) {

Todas las dependencias que hemos visto son una función o clase fija.

Pero podría haber casos en los que quieras poder establecer parámetros en la dependencia, sin tener que declarar muchas funciones o clases diferentes.

Imaginemos que queremos tener una dependencia que revise si el parámetro de query `q` contiene algún contenido fijo.

Pero queremos poder parametrizar ese contenido fijo.

            try {
                handle.close();
            } catch (Exception e) {
                log.error("Error closing witness RPC handle", e);
            }
        }
    }
    
    // RPC Stub classes for witness operations
    private static class WitnessRegisterStub extends DcerpcMessage {
        private final WitnessRegisterRequest request;
        private WitnessRegisterResponse response;
        

        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> {
            new MsrpcLookupSids(null, testSids);
        });
    }

    @Test
    void constructor_shouldThrowExceptionWithNullSids() {
        // Act & Assert - Null SID array causes NPE when accessing length
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> {
            new MsrpcLookupSids(mockPolicyHandle, null);
        });
    }

    @Test

        sut.close();

        verify(handle, never()).close(anyLong());
    }

    // Invalid input: constructing with null handle and invoking watch() NPEs
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Null handle causes NPE on watch() (invalid input)")
    void constructor_nullHandle_watch_throwsNPE() {
        SmbWatchHandleImpl sut = new SmbWatchHandleImpl(null, 0, false);

        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> {

        annotations = new ArrayList<>();
        for (Annotation a : classOrMethod.getDeclaredAnnotations()) {
          /*
           * We avoid reflecting on NullMarked because its @Target(..., MODULE) causes problems
           * under JDK 8.
           */
          if (!(a instanceof NullMarked)
              && a.annotationType().isAnnotationPresent(TesterAnnotation.class)) {
            annotations.add(a);

    * Because pydantic data structures are just instances of classes you define; auto-completion, linting, mypy and your intuition should all work properly with your validated data.
* Validate **complex structures**:
    * Use of hierarchical Pydantic models, Python `typing`’s `List` and `Dict`, etc.