// We can't directly test ProcessDestroyer without creating actual processes,
        // but we can test that the class exists and basic functionality
        try {
            // Use reflection to verify ProcessDestroyer class exists
            final Class<?> destroyerClass = Class.forName("org.codelibs.fess.thumbnail.impl.CommandGenerator$ProcessDestroyer");

PrimaryExpr   = Operand |
                Conversion |
                MethodExpr |
                PrimaryExpr Selector |
                PrimaryExpr Index |
                PrimaryExpr Slice |
                PrimaryExpr TypeAssertion |
                PrimaryExpr Arguments .

Selector      = "." identifier .
Index         = "[" Expression [ "," ] "]" .
Slice         = "[" [ Expression ] ":" [ Expression ] "]" |

// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

package tar

import (
	"bytes"
	"errors"
	"fmt"
	"internal/testenv"
	"io"
	"io/fs"
	"maps"
	"math"
	"os"
	"path"
	"path/filepath"
	"reflect"
	"slices"
	"strings"
	"testing"
	"time"
)

type testError struct{ error }

type fileOps []any // []T where T is (string | int64)

// testFile is an io.ReadWriteSeeker where the IO operations performed

 * that they are safe for concurrent use, but if other threads modify the map after the iterator is
 * created, it is undefined which of these changes, if any, are reflected in that iterator. These
 * iterators never throw {@link ConcurrentModificationException}.
 *
 * <p>If {@link #weakKeys} or {@link #weakValues} are requested, it is possible for a key or value

        // Setter should update the field
        transformer.setName("setterAccess");
        assertEquals("setterAccess", transformer.name);

        // Field modification should be reflected in getter
        transformer.name = "modifiedField";
        assertEquals("modifiedField", transformer.getName());
    }

    /**
     * Test name persistence across operations
     */

    // the `keys` and `values` arrays do not need to change. But because the "short hash" now has a
    // different number of bits, we must rewrite each element of `entries` so that its contribution
    // to the full hashcode reflects the change, and so that its `next` link corresponds to the new
    // linked list of entries with the new short hash.
    for (int oldTableIndex = 0; oldTableIndex <= oldMask; oldTableIndex++) {

import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Inherited;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Arrays;

import org.codelibs.fess.unit.UnitFessTestCase;

public class SecuredTest extends UnitFessTestCase {

    @Override
    public void setUp() throws Exception {

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.lenient;

import java.lang.reflect.Field;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.ExtendWith;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

import java.lang.reflect.Field;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.DisplayName;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Properties;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.DisplayName;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Nested;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.Mock;