/*
           * requireNonNull is safe because we ensure that the first `distinct` elements have been
           * populated.
           */
          return of(requireNonNull(dedupedElements[0]));
        default:
          /*
           * The suppression is safe because we ensure that the first `distinct` elements have been
           * populated.
           */
          @SuppressWarnings("nullness")

## Tools {#tools}

### Go command {#go-command}

<!-- go.dev/issue/74667 -->
`cmd/doc`, and `go tool doc` have been deleted. `go doc` can be used as
a replacement for `go tool doc`: it takes the same flags and arguments and
has the same behavior.

          <version>4.5.0</version>
          <executions>
            <!--
            We can apparently have only one <jdk> per execution: Others are silently ignored :(
            To properly test this, you need to remove existing toolchains:
            rm -rf ~/.m2/jdks/ ~/.m2/toolchains.xml
            (But don't run that if you have put something into ~/.m2/toolchains.xml yourself.)
            -->
            <execution>

    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {
      bf.put(Integer.toString(i));
    }
    assertApproximateElementCountGuess(bf, numInsertions);

    // Assert that the BF "might" have all of the even numbers.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {
      assertTrue(bf.mightContain(Integer.toString(i)));
    }

    }
  }

  override fun loadForRequest(url: HttpUrl): List<Cookie> {
    val cookieHeaders =
      try {
        // The RI passes all headers. We don't have 'em, so we don't pass 'em!
        cookieHandler.get(url.toUri(), emptyMap<String, List<String>>())
      } catch (e: IOException) {
        Platform.get().log("Loading cookies failed for " + url.resolve("/...")!!, WARN, e)

  }

  private void assertBad(String spec) {
    try {
      HostSpecifier.fromValid(spec);
      fail("Should have thrown IllegalArgumentException: " + spec);
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }

    try {
      HostSpecifier.from(spec);
      fail("Should have thrown ParseException: " + spec);
    } catch (ParseException expected) {

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},