### コード内での`HTTPException`の発生

`HTTPException`は通常のPythonの例外であり、APIに関連するデータを追加したものです。

Pythonの例外なので、`return`ではなく、`raise`です。

これはまた、*path operation関数*の内部で呼び出しているユーティリティ関数の内部から`HTTPException`を発生させた場合、*path operation関数*の残りのコードは実行されず、そのリクエストを直ちに終了させ、`HTTPException`からのHTTPエラーをクライアントに送信することを意味します。

値を返す`return`よりも例外を発生させることの利点は、「依存関係とセキュリティ」のセクションでより明確になります。

この例では、クライアントが存在しないIDでアイテムを要求した場合、`404`のステータスコードを持つ例外を発生させます:

  fun encodedLength(bytes: ByteString): Int {
    var bitCount = 0L

    for (i in 0 until bytes.size) {
      val byteIn = bytes[i] and 0xff
      bitCount += CODE_BIT_COUNTS[byteIn].toLong()
    }

    return ((bitCount + 7) shr 3).toInt() // Round up to an even byte.
  }

  fun decode(
    source: BufferedSource,
    byteCount: Long,
    sink: BufferedSink,
  ) {
    var node = root

    @ValueSource(ints = { 1, 10, 100, 500, 1024 })
    void testReadDataWireFormatWithVariousSizes(int dataSize) throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        if (dataSize > outputBuffer.length) {
            return; // Skip sizes larger than buffer
        }

        byte[] sourceData = new byte[dataSize];
        for (int i = 0; i < dataSize; i++) {
            sourceData[i] = (byte) (i % 256);
        }

		t.Errorf("Failed, result.DeletedAt: %v is not same as expected.DeletedAt: %v", result.DeletedAt, expected.DeletedAt)
	}
}

func TestDeletedAtOneOr(t *testing.T) {
	actualSQL := DB.ToSQL(func(tx *gorm.DB) *gorm.DB {
		return tx.Or("id = ?", 1).Find(&User{})
	})

	if !regexp.MustCompile(` WHERE id = 1 AND .users.\..deleted_at. IS NULL`).MatchString(actualSQL) {
		t.Fatalf("invalid sql generated, got %v", actualSQL)
	}
}

 * code shouldn't use these, they're necessary for clients migrating from OkHttp 3.x and this test
 * ensures the symbols remain available and with the expected parameter and return types.
 */
@Suppress(
  "DEPRECATION_ERROR",
  "UNUSED_VALUE",
  "UNUSED_VARIABLE",
  "VARIABLE_WITH_REDUNDANT_INITIALIZER",
)
class KotlinDeprecationErrorTest {
  private val factory = TestValueFactory()

    }

    @Test
    public void testCanCacheDirectoryListing() {
        String directoryPath = "/test/dir";
        Smb2LeaseKey leaseKey = new Smb2LeaseKey();

        // No cache entry - should return false
        assertFalse(directoryLeaseManager.canCacheDirectoryListing(directoryPath));

        // Create cache entry with read lease
        when(baseLeaseManager.requestLease(anyString(), anyInt())).thenReturn(leaseKey);

    public ExtractData getText(final InputStream inputStream, final Map<String, String> params) {
        // Custom extraction logic
        ExtractData extractData = new ExtractData();
        // ... implementation
        return extractData;
    }
}

// Register custom extractor
container.singleton("customExtractor", CustomExtractor.class);
container.singleton("extractorFactory", ExtractorFactory.class, factory -> {

    for (Class<?> mutableClass : mutableClasses) {
      Object instance = ArbitraryInstances.get(mutableClass);
      assertNotNull("Expected to return non-null for: " + mutableClass, instance);
      assertNotSame(
          "Expected to return fresh instance for: " + mutableClass,
          instance,
          ArbitraryInstances.get(mutableClass));
    }
  }

  private enum EmptyEnum {}

```Python
Settings()
```

um novo objeto `Settings` é instanciado, e durante a instanciação, o arquivo `.env` é lido novamente.

Se a função da dependência fosse apenas:

```Python
def get_settings():
    return Settings()
```

Iriamos criar um novo objeto a cada requisição, e estaríamos lendo o arquivo `.env` a cada requisição. ⚠️

        long startTime = System.nanoTime();
        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
            auth1.equals(auth2);
        }
        long endTime = System.nanoTime();

        return (endTime - startTime) / iterations;
    }