* and Joiner.on(...).useForNull(...) both declare the same return type: plain Joiner. To ensure
     * that users *can* pass null arguments to Joiner, we annotate it as if it always tolerates null
     * inputs, rather than as if it never tolerates them.
     *
     * We rely on checkers to implement special cases to catch dangerous calls to join(), etc. based

    InternalEntry<Object, Object, ?> entry = null;
    for (int i = 0; i < originalCount; i++) {
      Object key = new Object();
      Object value = new Object();
      int hash = map.hash(key);
      // chain all entries together as we only have a single bucket
      entry = segment.newEntryForTesting(key, hash, entry);
      segment.setValueForTesting(entry, value);
    }
    segment.setTableEntryForTesting(0, entry);

    InternalEntry<Object, Object, ?> entry = null;
    for (int i = 0; i < originalCount; i++) {
      Object key = new Object();
      Object value = new Object();
      int hash = map.hash(key);
      // chain all entries together as we only have a single bucket
      entry = segment.newEntryForTesting(key, hash, entry);
      segment.setValueForTesting(entry, value);
    }
    segment.setTableEntryForTesting(0, entry);

        #  Normally this 'except' means no getting meta data for excepted tables.
        #  (so the tables are not existing in SchemaHTML and HistoryHTML and so on).
        #  But you can specify the '@gen' suffix that means generate-only except.
        #  A table with the mark can be treated as documents but no generating classes.
        #
        #; tableExceptList = list:{FOO_TABLE@gen ; prefix:FOO_@gen ; suffix:_FOO ; contain:_FOO_}

 * individual {@code char} values, it is not safe to assume that {@code escape(s)} is equivalent to
 * {@code escape(s.substring(0, n)) + escape(s.substring(n))} for arbitrary {@code n}. This is
 * because of the possibility of splitting a surrogate pair. The only case in which it is safe to
 * escape strings and concatenate the results is if you can rule out this possibility, either by

            return filename;
        }
        final StringBuilder buf = new StringBuilder(filename.length() + 10);
        for (int i = 0; i < filename.length(); i++) {
            final char c = filename.charAt(i);
            switch (c) {
            case '?':
                buf.append("%3f");
                break;
            case '#':
                buf.append("%23");
                break;

        assertEquals("concurrentRule", testRule.getRuleId());
        assertSame(processor, testRule.getResponseProcessor());
    }

    /**
     * Test rule chain with AbstractRule
     */
    public void test_ruleChain() {
        // Create chain of rules
        TestAbstractRule rule1 = new TestAbstractRule();
        rule1.crawlerContainer = container;
        rule1.setRuleId("rule1");

if ($env:MAVEN_USER_HOME) {
  $MAVEN_HOME_PARENT = "$env:MAVEN_USER_HOME/wrapper/dists/$distributionUrlNameMain"
}
$MAVEN_HOME_NAME = ([System.Security.Cryptography.MD5]::Create().ComputeHash([byte[]][char[]]$distributionUrl) | ForEach-Object {$_.ToString("x2")}) -join ''
$MAVEN_HOME = "$MAVEN_HOME_PARENT/$MAVEN_HOME_NAME"

if (Test-Path -Path "$MAVEN_HOME" -PathType Container) {

    client =
      client
        .newBuilder()
        .addNetworkInterceptor(
          Interceptor { chain: Interceptor.Chain ->
            ifNoneMatch.compareAndSet(null, chain.request().header("If-None-Match"))
            chain.proceed(chain.request())
          },
        ).build()

    // Confirm the value is cached and intercepted.

 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockA)
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Neither thread will progress because each is waiting for the other. In more complex
 * applications, cycles can arise from interactions among more than 2 locks:
 *
 * <pre>
 * Thread1: acquire(LockA) --X acquire(LockB)
 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockC)
 * ...
 * ThreadN: acquire(LockN) --X acquire(LockA)
 * </pre>
 *