constraints.Digits.message = {item} debe ser un número. (Esperado: <número>.<número>)
constraints.Future.message = {item} debe ser una fecha futura.
constraints.Max.message = {item} debe ser menor o igual que {value}.
constraints.Min.message = {item} debe ser mayor o igual que {value}.
constraints.NotNull.message = {item} es obligatorio.
constraints.Null.message = {item} debe ser nulo.
constraints.Past.message = {item} debe ser una fecha pasada.

¿En realidad no tienes usuarios que inicien sesión en tu aplicación sino robots, bots u otros sistemas, que solo tienen un token de acceso? Una vez más, todo funciona igual.

Usa cualquier tipo de modelo, cualquier tipo de clase, cualquier tipo de base de datos que necesites para tu aplicación. **FastAPI** te cubre con el sistema de inyección de dependencias.

## Tamaño del código

@GwtCompatible
public class UnhashableObject implements Comparable<UnhashableObject> {
  private final int value;

  public UnhashableObject(int value) {
    this.value = value;
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@Nullable Object object) {
    if (object instanceof UnhashableObject) {
      UnhashableObject that = (UnhashableObject) object;
      return this.value == that.value;
    }
    return false;
  }

  @Override

  @Override
  public int compare(Object left, Object right) {
    return left.toString().compareTo(right.toString());
  }

  // preserve singleton-ness, so equals() and hashCode() work correctly
  private Object readResolve() {
    return INSTANCE;
  }

  @Override
  public String toString() {
    return "Ordering.usingToString()";
  }

        assertEquals("value3", paramMap.get("key3"));

        // Test with multiple equals signs
        value = "key1=value=with=equals\nkey2=another=value";
        paramMap = ParameterUtil.parse(value);
        assertEquals(2, paramMap.size());
        assertEquals("value=with=equals", paramMap.get("key1"));
        assertEquals("another=value", paramMap.get("key2"));

            if (Constants.SEARCH_LOG_ACCESS_TYPE_JSON.equals(accessType)) {
                searchLog.setAccessType(Constants.SEARCH_LOG_ACCESS_TYPE_JSON);
            } else if (Constants.SEARCH_LOG_ACCESS_TYPE_GSA.equals(accessType)) {
                searchLog.setAccessType(Constants.SEARCH_LOG_ACCESS_TYPE_GSA);
            } else if (Constants.SEARCH_LOG_ACCESS_TYPE_OTHER.equals(accessType)) {

        FessUserNotFoundException exception2 = new FessUserNotFoundException("user2");

        assertNotSame(exception1, exception2);
        assertFalse(exception1.getMessage().equals(exception2.getMessage()));
        assertEquals("User is not found: user1", exception1.getMessage());
        assertEquals("User is not found: user2", exception2.getMessage());
    }

        assertTrue(result1.startsWith("FessUserTimeZoneProcessProvider:{"));
        assertTrue(result2.startsWith("FessUserTimeZoneProcessProvider:{"));

        // But different hash codes
        assertFalse(result1.equals(result2));
    }

    // Test static field initialization
    public void test_centralTimeZone_initialization() {
        // Verify that centralTimeZone is properly initialized

      Object candidateKey = entry.getKey();

      /*
       * Assume that equals uses the == optimization when appropriate, and that
       * it would check hash codes as an optimization when appropriate. If we
       * did these things, it would just make things worse for the most
       * performance-conscious users.
       */
      if (key.equals(candidateKey)) {
        return entry.getValue();
      }
    }

        // toString should include class marker and not throw
        assertTrue(cloned.toString().startsWith("Kerb5Authenticator["));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("equals/hashCode: subject semantics")
    void equalsAndHashCode_subjectSemantics() {
        Kerb5Authenticator a = new Kerb5Authenticator((Subject) null);
        Kerb5Authenticator b = new Kerb5Authenticator((Subject) null);