|   </configuration>
     | </plugin>
     | ...
     |
     | NOTE: If you just wanted to inject this configuration whenever someone set 'target-env' to
     |       anything, you could just leave off the <value/> inside the activation-property.
     |
    <profile>
      <id>env-dev</id>

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>target-env</name>
          <value>dev</value>

    // System.identityHashCode, which means the assignment of keys to segments is nondeterministic,
    // so more than (maximumSize / #segments) keys could get assigned to the same segment, which
    // would cause one to be evicted.
    return new CacheBuilderFactory()
        .withKeyStrengths(ImmutableSet.of(Strength.STRONG, Strength.WEAK))

   *       happens all the time in normal conditions (i.e., android) the OS must make a tradeoff
   *       between paging memory and killing other processes - so allocating a gigantic buffer and
   *       then sequentially accessing it could result in other processes dying. This is solvable
   *       via madvise(2), but that obviously doesn't exist in java.
   *   <li>Ordinary copy. Kernel copies bytes into a kernel buffer, from a kernel buffer into a

package tar

import (
	"errors"
	"fmt"
	"internal/godebug"
	"io/fs"
	"maps"
	"math"
	"path"
	"reflect"
	"strconv"
	"strings"
	"time"
)

// BUG: Use of the Uid and Gid fields in Header could overflow on 32-bit
// architectures. If a large value is encountered when decoding, the result
// stored in Header will be the truncated version.

var tarinsecurepath = godebug.New("tarinsecurepath")

var (

- LeaseLocks could now have custom labels that different holders would overwrite when they became the holder of the underlying lease. ([#131632](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/131632), [@DerekFrank](https://github.com/DerekFrank))

  // in the short hash. We saw that a mask of 0x7f would keep the 7-bit value 0x6f from a full
  // hashcode of 0x89abcdef. The imaginary `hash` value would then be the remaining top 25 bits,
  // 0x89abcd80. To this is added (or'd) the `next` value, which is an index within `entries`
  // (and therefore within `keys` and `values`) of another entry that has the same short hash

    assertThat(orig.toString())
        .contains("Exception thrown from implementation: class java.lang.StackOverflowError");
  }

  // Regression test for a case where we would fail to execute listeners immediately on done futures
  // this would be observable from an afterDone callback
  public void testListenersExecuteImmediately_fromAfterDone() {
    AbstractFuture<String> f =
        new AbstractFuture<String>() {

              return null;
            }
            RangeMapEntry<K, V> candidate = null;
            if (r.lowerBound.compareTo(subRange.lowerBound) == 0) {
              // r could be truncated on the left
              Entry<Cut<K>, RangeMapEntry<K, V>> entry =
                  entriesByLowerBound.floorEntry(r.lowerBound);
              if (entry != null) {
                candidate = entry.getValue();

					RuleID: rule.ID,
					Due:    due,
				})
			}
			// No other conflicting actions in this rule can apply to an object with current version as DEL marker
			// Note: There could be other rules with earlier expiration which need to be considered.
			// See TestDelMarkerExpiration
			continue
		}

		// NoncurrentVersionExpiration
		if !obj.IsLatest && rule.NoncurrentVersionExpiration.set {

   * TODO: b/315526394 - Skip the Builder entirely for the of(...) methods, since we don't need to
   * worry that we might trigger the fallback to the JDK-backed implementation? (The varargs one
   * _could_, so we could keep it as it is. Or we could convince ourselves that hash flooding is
   * unlikely in practice there, too.)
   */

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set containing the given elements, minus duplicates, in the order each was