}

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

            // Verify command can be retrieved from parent
            assertEquals(0, response.getCommand());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should work with different buffer sizes")
        void testDifferentBufferSizes() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // Minimum size buffer
            byte[] minBuffer = new byte[20];
            SMBUtil.writeInt2(17, minBuffer, 0);

        assertNotNull(directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir1));
        assertNotNull(directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir2));
        assertNotNull(directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir3));

        // Verify different scopes
        assertEquals(DirectoryCacheScope.IMMEDIATE_CHILDREN, directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir1).getScope());
        assertEquals(DirectoryCacheScope.METADATA_ONLY, directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir2).getScope());

import java.util.regex.Pattern;
import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Tests for {@link ForwardingWrapperTester}. Live in a different package to detect reflection
 * access issues, if any.
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
public class ForwardingWrapperTesterTest extends TestCase {

        // Verify configuration is used - getPid() is called in parent constructor
        verify(mockConfig, atLeastOnce()).getPid();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test transaction response with different commands")
    void testTransactionResponseWithDifferentCommands() {
        // Test with TRANSACTION command
        TestSmbComTransactionResponse resp1 =

            assertEquals(3, result.size());
        }

        // Verify close was called
        verify(autoCloseableHandle, times(1)).close();
    }

    /**
     * Test multiple watch calls returning different results
     */
    @Test
    void testMultipleWatchCalls() throws CIFSException {
        // Setup mock behavior for multiple calls
        List<FileNotifyInformation> firstBatch = Arrays.asList(fileNotifyInfo1);

        byte[] buffer = new byte[20];
        long expectedIndexNumber = 0xCAFEBABEDEADBEEFL;
        SMBUtil.writeInt8(expectedIndexNumber, buffer, 0);

        // Decode with different length parameters
        int bytesDecoded1 = fileInternalInfo.decode(buffer, 0, 5); // Less than needed
        assertEquals(8, bytesDecoded1); // Should still return 8

  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {
    class MyError extends Error {}
    CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(2);
    // we need to make sure the error gets thrown on a different thread.
    ExecutorService service = newSingleThreadExecutor();
    try {
      SequentialExecutor executor = new SequentialExecutor(service);
      Runnable errorTask =
          new Runnable() {

 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how

         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

        validClasses.add(new WeakReference<Class<? extends Exception>>(exceptionClass));
      }