}
    return uniqueIndex(values.iterator(), keyFunction);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a map with the given {@code values}, indexed by keys derived from those values. In
   * other words, each input value produces an entry in the map whose key is the result of applying
   * {@code keyFunction} to that value. These entries appear in the same order as the input values.
   * Example usage:

                if (ComponentUtil.getFessConfig().isAzureAdUseDomainServices() && displayableId.indexOf('@') >= 0) {
                    final String[] values = displayableId.split("@");
                    if (values.length > 1) {
                        permissionSet.add(systemHelper.getSearchRoleByUser(values[0]));
                    }
                }

	${MC} anonymous set $POLICY myminio/$BUCKET
}

# Try connecting to MinIO instance
{{- if .Values.tls.enabled }}
scheme=https
{{- else }}
scheme=http
{{- end }}
connectToMinio $scheme

{{ if .Values.buckets }}
{{ $global := . }}
# Create the buckets
{{- range .Values.buckets }}

      tags:
         - key: "name"
           value: "pick*" # match objects with tag 'name', with all values starting with 'pick'

      metadata:
         - key: "content-type"
           value: "image/*" # match objects with 'content-type', with all values starting with 'image/'

#    notify:
#      endpoint: "https://notify.endpoint" # notification endpoint to receive job status events

   * Returns a string containing the supplied unsigned {@code long} values separated by {@code
   * separator}. For example, {@code join("-", 1, 2, 3)} returns the string {@code "1-2-3"}.
   *
   * @param separator the text that should appear between consecutive values in the resulting string
   *     (but not at the start or end)
   * @param array an array of unsigned {@code long} values, possibly empty
   */

   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller
   * calls `create(Foo.class)`, rather than `create(map)`. That's fine; we just shouldn't rely on
   * it.
   */

      tags:
        - key: name
          value: pick* # match objects with tag 'name', all values starting with 'pick'
      metadata:
        - key: content-type
          value: image/* # match objects with 'content-type', all values starting with 'image/'
      size:
        lessThan: "10MiB" # match objects with size less than this value (e.g. 10MiB)

   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller
   * calls `create(Foo.class)`, rather than `create(map)`. That's fine; we just shouldn't rely on
   * it.
   */

   * Returns a string containing the supplied {@code short} values separated by {@code separator}.
   * For example, {@code join("-", (short) 1, (short) 2, (short) 3)} returns the string {@code
   * "1-2-3"}.
   *
   * @param separator the text that should appear between consecutive values in the resulting string
   *     (but not at the start or end)
   * @param array an array of {@code short} values, possibly empty
   */

   * Returns a string containing the supplied {@code short} values separated by {@code separator}.
   * For example, {@code join("-", (short) 1, (short) 2, (short) 3)} returns the string {@code
   * "1-2-3"}.
   *
   * @param separator the text that should appear between consecutive values in the resulting string
   *     (but not at the start or end)
   * @param array an array of {@code short} values, possibly empty
   */