/// tip

This is how you would handle **passwords**. Receive them, but don't return them in the API.

You would also **hash** the values of the passwords before storing them, **never store them in plain text**.

///

The fields of `HeroCreate` are:

* `name`
* `age`

        )


class OAuth2(SecurityBase):
    """
    This is the base class for OAuth2 authentication, an instance of it would be used
    as a dependency. All other OAuth2 classes inherit from it and customize it for
    each OAuth2 flow.

    You normally would not create a new class inheriting from it but use one of the
    existing subclasses, and maybe compose them if you want to support multiple flows.

If it was in a type annotation we could have used the vertical bar, as:

```Python
some_variable: PlaneItem | CarItem
```

But if we put that in the assignment `response_model=PlaneItem | CarItem` we would get an error, because Python would try to perform an **invalid operation** between `PlaneItem` and `CarItem` instead of interpreting that as a type annotation.

/// tip

This is a tip.

///

...it could be translated as:

```
/// tip

Esto es un consejo.

///

```

...but needs to keep the exact `tip` keyword. If it was translated to `consejo`, like:

```
/// consejo

Esto es un consejo.

///

```

it would change the style to the default one, it would look like:

/// consejo

Esto es un consejo.

Unified source directory

 Unified source directory structure that is analogous to the repository
 itself. This way locations of intermediary artifacts of a build would be
 in a known location. This would also help with developer setup i.e. getting
 new developers up and running. They could run a maven command and have all
 their source trees set up in the same way as their colleagues.

```

</div>

/// tip

With `pwdlib`, you could even configure it to be able to read passwords created by **Django**, a **Flask** security plug-in or many others.

So, you would be able to, for example, share the same data from a Django application in a database with a FastAPI application. Or gradually migrate a Django application using the same database.

You could load it at the top level of the module/file, but that would also mean that it would **load the model** even if you are just running a simple automated test, then that test would be **slow** because it would have to wait for the model to load before being able to run an independent part of the code.

    # For coverage
    # TODO: in theory this would allow declaring types that could be lists of bytes
    # to be read from files and other types, but I'm not even sure it's a good idea
    # to support it as a first class "feature"
    assert is_bytes_sequence_annotation(Union[list[str], list[bytes]])


def test_is_uploadfile_sequence_annotation():
    # For coverage

     *
     * - Any kind of Error from a listener. Even if we could distinguish that case (by exposing some
     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

It would also mean that if you get data from the `Request` object directly (for example, read the body) it won't be validated, converted or documented (with OpenAPI, for the automatic API user interface) by FastAPI.

Although any other parameter declared normally (for example, the body with a Pydantic model) would still be validated, converted, annotated, etc.