list.set(0, (byte) 4);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new byte[] {(byte) 0, (byte) 1, (byte) 2});
    newArray[1] = (byte) 5;
    assertThat((byte) list.get(1)).isEqualTo((byte) 1);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    byte[] array = {(byte) 0, (byte) 1, (byte) 2, (byte) 3};
    List<Byte> list = Bytes.asList(array);

			// walking the tree and copying it piecewise. If the directory tree
			// contains nested modules this could push a lot of unnecessary contents,
			// but for the golang.org/x repos it seems to be significantly (~2x)
			// faster than copying one file at a time (via filepath.WalkDir),
			// apparently due to high latency in 'adb' commands.
			if err := adb("push", modDir, deviceModDir); err != nil {

     */
    if (throwable instanceof Error) {
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): Do we really want to log this if we called setException(throwable) and it
       * returned true? This was intentional (CL 46470009), but it seems odd compared to how we
       * normally handle Error.
       *
       * Similarly, do we really want to log the same Error more than once?
       */
      log(throwable);
    }
  }

    * If it's the first translation for that language, it will have additional `mkdocs.yml` files, for those cases follow the instructions below.
* The PR doesn't add any additional or extraneous files.
* The translation seems to have a similar structure as the original English file.
* The translation doesn't seem to change the original content, for example with obvious additional documentation sections.

                this.readSize =
                        Math.min(th.getConfig().getReceiveBufferSize() - 70, th.areSignaturesActive() ? 0xFFFF - 70 : 0xFFFFFF - 70);
            }

            // there seems to be a bug with some servers that causes corruption if using signatures + CAP_LARGE_WRITE
            if (th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_LARGE_WRITEX) && !th.areSignaturesActive()) {

    list.set(0, (char) 4);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new char[] {(char) 0, (char) 1, (char) 2});
    newArray[1] = (char) 5;
    assertThat((char) list.get(1)).isEqualTo((char) 1);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    char[] array = {(char) 0, (char) 1, (char) 2, (char) 3};
    List<Character> list = Chars.asList(array);

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

transDays=$(./mc ilm rule list sitea/bucket --json | jq '.config.Rules[0].Transition.Days')
if [ $transDays -ne 0 ] || [ "${transDays}" == "null" ]; then
	echo "BUG: Transition rule on sitea seems to be overwritten"
	exit 1
fi

## Check replication of edit of prefix, tags and status of ILM Expiry Rules
./mc ilm rule edit --id "${id}" --prefix "newprefix" --tags "ntag1=nval1&ntag2=nval2" --disable sitea/bucket

    list.set(0, 4.0);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new double[] {0.0, 1.0, 2.0});
    newArray[1] = 5.0;
    assertThat((double) list.get(1)).isEqualTo(1.0);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    double[] array = {0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
    List<Double> list = Doubles.asList(array);