* work correctly. To allow concurrent update operations, wrap the multimap with a call to {@link
   * #synchronizedMultimap}.
   *
   * <p>Call this method only when the simpler methods {@link ArrayListMultimap#create()}, {@link
   * HashMultimap#create()}, {@link LinkedHashMultimap#create()}, {@link
   * LinkedListMultimap#create()}, {@link TreeMultimap#create()}, and {@link

   * work correctly. To allow concurrent update operations, wrap the multimap with a call to {@link
   * #synchronizedMultimap}.
   *
   * <p>Call this method only when the simpler methods {@link ArrayListMultimap#create()}, {@link
   * HashMultimap#create()}, {@link LinkedHashMultimap#create()}, {@link
   * LinkedListMultimap#create()}, {@link TreeMultimap#create()}, and {@link

   * order. However, the table's {@code row()} method returns instances of a different class than
   * {@code factory.get()} does.
   *
   * <p>Call this method only when the simpler factory methods in classes like {@link
   * HashBasedTable} and {@link TreeBasedTable} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>The views returned by the {@code Table} methods {@link Table#column}, {@link

          submittingTaskQueue.nextTask = task;
          // requireNonNull(delegate) is safe for reasons similar to requireNonNull(sequencer).
          submittingTaskQueue.nextExecutor = requireNonNull(delegate);
          delegate = null;
        } else {
          // requireNonNull(delegate) is safe for reasons similar to requireNonNull(sequencer).
          Executor localDelegate = requireNonNull(delegate);
          delegate = null;

   * order. However, the table's {@code row()} method returns instances of a different class than
   * {@code factory.get()} does.
   *
   * <p>Call this method only when the simpler factory methods in classes like {@link
   * HashBasedTable} and {@link TreeBasedTable} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>The views returned by the {@code Table} methods {@link Table#column}, {@link

    // twice as many reads and writes. But benchmarking shows that they usually perform better than
    // Dolphin. Reversal is about as good as Successive on average, and it is much simpler,
    // especially since we already have a `reverse` method.
    checkNotNull(array);
    checkPositionIndexes(fromIndex, toIndex, array.length);
    if (array.length <= 1) {
      return;
    }

   * between elements will be made, but the order in which those pairs of elements are passed to the
   * consumer is <i>not</i> defined.
   *
   * <p>Note that many usages of this method can be replaced with simpler calls to {@link #zip}.
   * This method behaves equivalently to {@linkplain #zip zipping} the stream elements into
   * temporary pair objects and then using {@link Stream#forEach} on that stream.
   *

   * between elements will be made, but the order in which those pairs of elements are passed to the
   * consumer is <i>not</i> defined.
   *
   * <p>Note that many usages of this method can be replaced with simpler calls to {@link #zip}.
   * This method behaves equivalently to {@linkplain #zip zipping} the stream elements into
   * temporary pair objects and then using {@link Stream#forEach} on that stream.
   *

        // Verify a sample of encrypted messages can be decrypted (to avoid extensive decryption that might fail)
        int sampleSize = Math.min(5, encrypted.size());
        for (int i = 0; i < sampleSize; i++) {
            try {
                byte[] decrypted = context.decryptMessage(encrypted.get(i));
                assertArrayEquals(messages.get(i).getBytes(), decrypted, "Sample message " + i + " should decrypt correctly");

 * code verbose. Whenever following this advice, you should check whether {@code Stream} could be
 * adopted more comprehensively in your code; the end result may be quite a bit simpler.
 *
 * <h3>See also</h3>
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a href=
 * "https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/OrderingExplained">{@code Ordering}</a>.
 *
 * @author Jesse Wilson