</annotations>
            <checkTestClasses>true</checkTestClasses>
            <signature>
              <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo.signature</groupId>
              <artifactId>java18</artifactId>
              <version>1.0</version>
            </signature>
          </configuration>
          <executions>
            <execution>

        assertEquals("fess.search_engine.http_address", Constants.FESS_SEARCH_ENGINE_HTTP_ADDRESS);
    }

    public void test_static_method_signature() {
        // Verify method signature is correct
        try {
            java.lang.reflect.Method method = SystemUtil.class.getMethod("getSearchEngineHttpAddress");

            // Check return type

  }

  /**
   * Creates an empty {@code TreeBasedTable} that uses the natural orderings of both row and column
   * keys.
   *
   * <p>The method signature specifies {@code R extends Comparable} with a raw {@link Comparable},
   * instead of {@code R extends Comparable<? super R>}, and the same for {@code C}. That's
   * necessary to support classes defined without generics.
   */

  @Override
  public boolean put(@ParametricNullness K key, @ParametricNullness V value) {
    return super.put(key, value);
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>Though the method signature doesn't say so explicitly, the returned map has {@link List}
   * values.
   */
  @Override
  public Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  /**

     * have the same nullness as E." Since we can't, we declare it to return nullable elements, and
     * we can override it in our non-null-guaranteeing subtypes to present a better signature to
     * their users.
     *
     * However, the checker *we* use has this special knowledge about `Collection.toArray()` anyway,
     * so in our implementation code, we can rely on that. That's why the expression below

    while (!descendant.equals(ancestor)) {
      classes.add(descendant);
      descendant = descendant.getSuperclass();
    }

    return classes;
  }

  /**
   * Not really a signature -- just the parts that affect whether one method is a fauxveride of a
   * method from an ancestor class.
   *
   * <p>See JLS 8.4.2 for the definition of the related "override-equivalent."
   */

    assertThat(min(2, 1, reverse)).isEqualTo(2);
    assertThat(max(1, 2, reverse)).isEqualTo(1);
    assertThat(max(2, 1, reverse)).isEqualTo(1);
  }

  /**
   * Fails compilation if the signature of min and max is changed to take {@code Comparator<T>}
   * instead of {@code Comparator<? super T>}.
   */
  public void testMinMaxWithSupertypeComparator() {

            <signature>
              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-23</artifactId>
              <version>0.12.0</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>

     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *
     * On the other hand, the current signature is consistent with the similar allAsList method. And
     * eventually this method may go away entirely in favor of an API like
     * whenAllComplete().collectSuccesses(). That API would have a signature more like the current
     * one.
     */
    return new ListFuture<V>(ImmutableList.copyOf(futures), false);
  }

 * {@code enterXxx}, {@code tryEnterXxx}, and {@code waitForXxx} method of the {@code Monitor} class
 * is analyzed reflectively to determine appropriate test cases based on its signature. Additional
 * ad hoc test cases can be found in {@link SupplementalMonitorTest}.
 *
 * @author Justin T. Sampson
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class GeneratedMonitorTest extends TestCase {