int FLAGS_TREE_COPY = 0x0020;

    // open function
    /**
     * Open function to fail if file exists.
     */
    int OPEN_FUNCTION_FAIL_IF_EXISTS = 0x0000;
    /**
     * Open function to overwrite if file exists.
     */
    int OPEN_FUNCTION_OVERWRITE_IF_EXISTS = 0x0020;

    /**
     * Share level security mode.
     */
    int SECURITY_SHARE = 0x00;
    /**
     * User level security mode.

		objectName     string
		destVolumeName string
		destObjectName string
		expectErr      bool
	}{
		{"foo", "myobject", "foo", "yourobject", false},
		{"foo", "yourobject", "bar", "myobject", false},
		// overwrite.
		{"foo", "otherobject", "bar", "myobject", false},
	}

	for i, testCase := range testCases {

        vagrant.setBox(box);

        vagrant.vmEnv("SYSTEM_JAVA_HOME", convertPath(project, vagrant, systemJdkProvider, "", ""));
        // set java home for gradle to use. package tests will overwrite/remove this for each test case
        vagrant.vmEnv("JAVA_HOME", convertPath(project, vagrant, gradleJdkProvider, "", ""));
        if (System.getenv("JENKINS_URL") != null) {

      apply {
        this.settings_.clear()
        this.settings_.merge(settings)
      }

    /**
     * Attempts to perform a web socket upgrade on the connection.
     * This will overwrite any previously set status, body, or streamHandler.
     */
    public fun webSocketUpgrade(listener: WebSocketListener): Builder =
      apply {
        status = "HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols"

If we had imported one after the other, like:

```Python
from .routers.items import router
from .routers.users import router
```

the `router` from `users` would overwrite the one from `items` and we wouldn't be able to use them at the same time.

So, to be able to use both of them in the same file, we import the submodules directly:

        assertEquals("IndependentPass123!", auth.getPassword());
    }

    /**
     * Test secure wiping actually clears memory patterns
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test secure wipe uses multiple overwrite patterns")
    public void testSecureWipePatterns() {
        NtlmPasswordAuthenticator auth = new NtlmPasswordAuthenticator("user", "WipePatternPass123!");

        // Get initial password

        // last_modified
        final Date lastModified = getLastModified(dataMap, responseData);
        if (lastModified != null) {
            dataMap.put(fessConfig.getIndexFieldLastModified(), lastModified); // overwrite
            // timestamp
            putResultDataBody(dataMap, fessConfig.getIndexFieldTimestamp(), lastModified);
        } else {
            // timestamp

If you check the previous app, in the UI you can see that, up to now, it lets the client decide the `id` of the `Hero` to create. 😱

We shouldn't let that happen, they could overwrite an `id` we already have assigned in the DB. Deciding the `id` should be done by the **backend** or the **database**, **not by the client**.

	_, ok := err.(ReplicationPermissionCheck)
	return ok
}

// DataMovementOverwriteErr - captures the error when a data movement activity
// like rebalance incorrectly tries to overwrite an object.
type DataMovementOverwriteErr GenericError

func (de DataMovementOverwriteErr) Error() string {
	objInfoStr := fmt.Sprintf("bucket=%s object=%s", de.Bucket, de.Object)
	if de.VersionID != "" {

  @Synchronized
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  override fun flush() {
    if (!initialized) return

    checkNotClosed()
    trimToSize()
    journalWriter!!.flush()
  }

  @Synchronized fun isClosed(): Boolean = closed

  /** Closes this cache. Stored values will remain on the filesystem. */
  @Synchronized
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  override fun close() {
    if (!initialized || closed) {