@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // using raw types to avoid a bug in our nullness checker :(
        InternalEntry entry = map.getEntry(sample);
        if (entry != null) {
          Object canonical = entry.getKey();
          if (canonical != null) { // only matters if weak/soft keys are used
            // The compiler would know this is safe if not for our use of raw types (see above).
            @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

name: Proposals
description: New external API or other notable changes
title: "proposal: import/path: proposal title"
labels: ["Proposal"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: "Our proposal process is documented here: https://go.dev/s/proposal-process"
  - type: textarea
    id: proposal-details
    attributes:
      label: "Proposal Details"
      description: "Please provide the details of your proposal here."
    validations:

blank_issues_enabled: false
contact_links:
  - name: Ask for help
    url: http://help.gradle.org/
    about: If you need help with Gradle or have a usage question, please reach our community instead of creating an issue.
  - name: Create an issue without template
    url: https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/new?template=blank

	OSX_VERSION="10.8"
	KNAME=$(uname -s)
	ARCH=$(uname -m)
	case "${KNAME}" in
	SunOS)
		ARCH=$(isainfo -k)
		;;
	esac
}

## FIXME:
## In OSX, 'readlink -f' option does not exist, hence
## we have our own readlink -f behavior here.
## Once OSX has the option, below function is good enough.
##
## readlink() {
##     return /bin/readlink -f "$1"
## }
##
readlink() {
	TARGET_FILE=$1

        - Documentation Bug
        - Others
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Please make sure that this is a bug. As per our [GitHub Policy](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/ISSUES.md), we only address code/doc bugs, performance issues, feature requests and build/installation issues on GitHub.

  - type: dropdown
    id: tf-nightly

Unlike many projects on GitHub, the Go project does not use its bug tracker for general discussion or asking questions.
We only use our bug tracker for tracking bugs and tracking proposals going through the [Proposal Process](https://go.dev/s/proposal-process).

For asking questions, see:

* [The golang-nuts mailing list](https://groups.google.com/d/forum/golang-nuts)

* [The Go Forum](https://forum.golangbridge.org/), a web-based forum

  @AndroidIncompatible // Presumably GC doesn't trigger, despite our efforts.
  public void testWeakImplementations() {
    for (Striped<?> striped : weakImplementations()) {
      WeakReference<Object> weakRef = new WeakReference<>(striped.get(new Object()));
      GcFinalization.awaitClear(weakRef);
    }
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // Presumably GC doesn't trigger, despite our efforts.
  public void testWeakReadWrite() {

  @AndroidIncompatible // Presumably GC doesn't trigger, despite our efforts.
  public void testWeakImplementations() {
    for (Striped<?> striped : weakImplementations()) {
      WeakReference<Object> weakRef = new WeakReference<>(striped.get(new Object()));
      GcFinalization.awaitClear(weakRef);
    }
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // Presumably GC doesn't trigger, despite our efforts.
  public void testWeakReadWrite() {

 * Add maven goal to avoid manual call to git submodule init.
 * Make hpack-test-case update itself from git, and run new tests.
 * Add maven goal to generate stories and a pull request to hpack-test-case
   to have others validate our output.

   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @ParametricNullness
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")