import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests our AtomicHelper fallback strategies in AbstractFuture.
 *
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization

    String message = "Waited " + timeout + " " + unit.toString().toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT);
    // Only report scheduling delay if larger than our spin threshold - otherwise it's just noise
    if (remainingNanos + SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS < 0) {
      // We over-waited for our timeout.
      message += " (plus ";
      long overWaitNanos = -remainingNanos;
      long overWaitUnits = unit.convert(overWaitNanos, NANOSECONDS);

   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @ParametricNullness
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Disables Animal Sniffer's checking of compatibility with older versions of Java/Android.
 *
 * <p>Each package's copy of this annotation needs to be listed in our {@code pom.xml}.
 */
@Target({METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR, TYPE, FIELD})
@NullMarked

    String message = "Waited " + timeout + " " + unit.toString().toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT);
    // Only report scheduling delay if larger than our spin threshold - otherwise it's just noise
    if (remainingNanos + SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS < 0) {
      // We over-waited for our timeout.
      message += " (plus ";
      long overWaitNanos = -remainingNanos;
      long overWaitUnits = unit.convert(overWaitNanos, NANOSECONDS);

         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The
         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We
         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new

    available in those versions!


## Version 4.8.0

_2020-07-11_

 *  New: Change `HeldCertificate.Builder` to use its own ASN.1 certificate encoder. This is part
    of our effort to remove the okhttp-tls module's dependency on Bouncy Castle. We think Bouncy
    Castle is great! But it's a large dependency (6.5 MiB) and its security provider feature
    impacts VM-wide behavior.

      // We check the state after adding the listener as a way to ensure that our listener was added
      // to a NEW service.
      checkArgument(service.state() == NEW, "Can only manage NEW services, %s", service);
    }
    // We have installed all of our listeners and after this point any state transition should be
    // correct.
    this.state.markReady();
  }

  /**

title: ''
labels: enhancement
assignees: ''

---

Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution already exists!

ttrsFound"),b||f.filter("input[placeholder]").each(function(){this.__defaultValue=this.getAttribute("placeholder"),a(this).bind("focus",function(){this.value===this.__defaultValue&&(this.value="",a(this).removeClass("showing-placeholder"))}).bind("blur",function(){""===a.trim(this.value)&&(this.value=this.__defaultValue,a(this).addClass("showing-placeholder"))})})})};a.formUtils.$win.bind("validatorsLoaded formValidationSetup",function(b,c){c||(c=a("form")),e(c)}),a.formUtils.setupValidationUsin...