},
		{
			"EC:4:5",
			StorageClass{
				Parity: 4,
			},
			errors.New("Too many sections in EC:4:5"),
		},
		{
			"EC:A",
			StorageClass{
				Parity: 4,
			},
			errors.New(`strconv.Atoi: parsing "A": invalid syntax`),
		},
		{
			"AB",
			StorageClass{
				Parity: 4,
			},
			errors.New("Too few sections in AB"),
		},
	}
	for i, tt := range tests {

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull;

/**
 * Verifies that plugin execution sections in the parent POM that have
 * inherit == false are not inherited to the child POM.
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {

4. Fixes are prepared for the latest release.
5. On the date that the fixes are applied a security advisory will be published on <https://blog.min.io>.
   Please inform us in your report email whether MinIO should mention your contribution w.r.t. fixing
   the security issue. By default MinIO will **not** publish this information to protect your privacy.

These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.  If
identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Library,
and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
sections when you distribute them as separate works.  But when you
distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based

     */
    public abstract ConfigurableFileCollection getClasspath();

    /**
     * A working directory to be used to stage documentation as its generated.
     * All of the sections of the documentation have working directories off of this one.
     */
    public abstract DirectoryProperty getStagingRoot();

    /**
     * The final location to place all rendered documentation.
     */

    attributes:
      label: Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?
      description: If so, how does this proposal differ?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1. Mention the related proposals 
        2. then describe how this proposal differs       
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: error-handling-proposal
    attributes:

But you can still document it as described in [Additional Responses in OpenAPI](additional-responses.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

    /**
     * Merges default values from the dependency management section of the given model into itself.
     *
     * @param model The model into which to merge the values specified by its dependency management sections, must not
     *            be <code>null</code>.
     * @param request The model building request that holds further settings, must not be {@code null}.

        }
    }

    @Test
    public void testConvertWithNumbersAndSymbols() throws IOException {
        // Test convert with numbers and symbols
        String text = "123 456.789 #hashtag @mention";
        String field = "content";

        List<String> results = converter.convert(text, field, "en");

        assertNotNull(results);
    }

        IllegalArgumentException ex = assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RequestParam.valueOf(badName));
        assertTrue(ex.getMessage().contains(badName), "Exception message should mention the bad name");
    }

    // Edge/Invalid: empty string is invalid for valueOf
    @ParameterizedTest
    @EmptySource
    @DisplayName("valueOf(\"\") throws IllegalArgumentException for empty input")