---
name: Bug report
about: Create a report to help us improve
title: ''
labels: bug
assignees: ''

---

(_Please use [discuss.codelibs.org](https://discuss.codelibs.org/c/FessEN/8) before filing a bug._)

**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error

produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the
terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

    a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified
    it, and giving a relevant date.

    b) The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is
    released under this License and any conditions added under section

This is in contrast to the **development** stages, where you are constantly changing the code, breaking it and fixing it, stopping and restarting the development server, etc.

## Deployment Strategies { #deployment-strategies }

There are several ways to do it depending on your specific use case and the tools that you use.

		builder.WriteString(" HAVING ")
		Where{Exprs: groupBy.Having}.Build(builder)
	}
}

// MergeClause merge group by clause
func (groupBy GroupBy) MergeClause(clause *Clause) {
	if v, ok := clause.Expression.(GroupBy); ok {
		copiedColumns := make([]Column, len(v.Columns))
		copy(copiedColumns, v.Columns)
		groupBy.Columns = append(copiedColumns, groupBy.Columns...)

		copiedHaving := make([]Expression, len(v.Having))

				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "role"}},
				Having:  []clause.Expression{clause.Eq{"role", "admin"}},
			}},
			"SELECT * FROM `users` GROUP BY `role` HAVING `role` = ?",
			[]interface{}{"admin"},
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.GroupBy{
				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "role"}},
				Having:  []clause.Expression{clause.Eq{"role", "admin"}},
			}, clause.GroupBy{

## About security, APIs, and docs { #about-security-apis-and-docs }

Hiding your documentation user interfaces in production *shouldn't* be the way to protect your API.

That doesn't add any extra security to your API, the *path operations* will still be available where they are.

If there's a security flaw in your code, it will still exist.

     */
    @Nonnull
    Optional<Boolean> infer();

    /**
     * Should fix Maven 4 compatibility issues in POMs.
     * This includes fixing unsupported combine attributes, duplicate dependencies,
     * unsupported expressions, and other Maven 4 validation issues.
     *
     * @return an {@link Optional} containing the boolean value {@code true} if specified, or empty

		t.Errorf("name should be groupby, but got %v, total should be 60, but got %v", name, total)
	}

	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Select("name, sum(age) as total").Where("name LIKE ?", "groupby%").Group("name").Having("name = ?", "groupby1").Row().Scan(&name, &total); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happen, but got %v", err)
	}

	if name != "groupby1" || total != 660 {

* RBAC: the `system:node` role is no longer automatically granted to the `system:nodes` group in new clusters. It is recommended that nodes be authorized using the `Node` authorization mode instead. Installations that wish to continue giving all members of the `system:nodes` group the `system:node` role (which grants broad read access, including all secrets and configmaps) must create an installation-specific `ClusterRoleBinding`. ([#49638](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/49638),...

4. Wait for 5 mins (as alert is configured to be firing after 5 mins), and verify that you see an entry in webhook for the alert as well as in Prometheus console as shown below

```json
{
  "receiver": "web\\.hook",
  "status": "firing",
  "alerts": [
    {
      "status": "firing",
      "labels": {
        "alertname": "MinIOClusterTolerance",
        "instance": "localhost:9000",