* E} is an {@link Enum} type, use {@link EnumSet#noneOf} instead. Otherwise, strongly consider
   * using a {@code LinkedHashSet} instead, at the cost of increased memory footprint, to get
   * deterministic iteration behavior.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method is now unnecessary and should be treated as deprecated. Instead,

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code char} value {@code '\\u5432'}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static char fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

func (as *asciiSet) contains(c byte) bool {
	return as[c]
}

// shouldUseASCIISet returns whether to use the lookup table optimization.
// The threshold of 8 bytes balances initialization cost against per-byte
// search cost, performing well across all charset sizes.
//
// More complex heuristics (e.g., different thresholds per charset size)
// add branching overhead that eats away any theoretical improvements.

     * references (currently executing code, file descriptors).
     *
     * Depending on the usage scenario, this may have some benefit as there won't be any delays for restablishing these
     * resources, however comes at the cost of having to properly release all SmbFile instances you no longer need.
     *
     * @return whether to use strict resource lifecycle
     */
    boolean isStrictResourceLifecycle();

    /**

	testCases := []struct {
		objectName string
		shouldPass bool
	}{
		// cases which should pass the test.
		// passing in valid object name.
		{"object", true},
		{"The Shining Script <v1>.pdf", true},
		{"Cost Benefit Analysis (2009-2010).pptx", true},
		{"117Gn8rfHL2ACARPAhaFd0AGzic9pUbIA/5OCn5A", true},
		{"SHØRT", true},
		{"f*le", true},
		{"contains-^-caret", true},
		{"contains-|-pipe", true},

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code short} value {@code 0x5432}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static short fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

     * sizing; if the Set uses different equality semantics, it might contain duplicates according
     * to equals(), and we will deduplicate those properly, albeit at some cost in allocations.
     */
    int expectedSize =
        elements instanceof Set ? array.length : estimatedSizeForUnknownDuplication(array.length);
    return fromArrayWithExpectedSize(array, expectedSize);
  }

   * 0x12131415}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 4 elements
   */
  public static int fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

   * {@code long} value {@code 0x1213141516171819L}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 8 elements
   */
  public static long fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> CopyOnWriteArrayList<E> newCopyOnWriteArrayList(
      Iterable<? extends E> elements) {
    // We copy elements to an ArrayList first, rather than incurring the
    // quadratic cost of adding them to the COWAL directly.
    Collection<? extends E> elementsCollection =
        (elements instanceof Collection)
            ? (Collection<? extends E>) elements
            : newArrayList(elements);