// Happens with non-robolectric unit tests
      System.err.println("Possibly running android unit test without robolectric")
      re.printStackTrace()
    } catch (ule: UnsatisfiedLinkError) {
      // Happens with Paparazzi - with Android classes on the classpath
      System.err.println("Possibly running android unit test without robolectric")
      ule.printStackTrace()
    }
  }

| ------- | ------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
| 5.x     | ✅                  | APIs subject to change in alpha releases.    |
| 4.x     | ✅                  | Android 5.0+ (API level 21+) and on Java 8+. |
| 3.x     | ❌ Ended 2021-12-31 | Android 2.3+ (API level 9+) and Java 7+.     |


## Reporting a Vulnerability

Square recognizes the important contributions the security research community

 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3.android

import assertk.assertThat
import assertk.assertions.isEqualTo
import okhttp3.HttpUrl.Companion.toHttpUrl
import org.junit.Test

/**
 * Run with "./gradlew :android-test-app:connectedCheck -PandroidBuild=true" and make sure ANDROID_SDK_ROOT is set.
 */
class PublicSuffixDatabaseTest {
  @Test

      .build()

  val sslLabsClients = SslLabsClient(client).clients()
  val ianaSuitesNew = fetchIanaSuites(client)

  val android5 = sslLabsClients.first { it.userAgent == "Android" && it.version == "5.0.0" }
  val android9 = sslLabsClients.first { it.userAgent == "Android" && it.version == "9.0" }
  val chrome33 = sslLabsClients.first { it.userAgent == "Chrome" && it.version == "33" }

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/** Support class added to a suite as part of {@link FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilderTest}. */
/*
 * @Ignore affects the Android test runner (and only the Android test runner): It respects JUnit 4
 * annotations even on JUnit 3 tests.
 *
 * TODO(b/225350400): Remove @Ignore, which doesn't seem like it should be necessary and probably
 * soon won't be.
 */

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/** Support class added to a suite as part of {@link FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilderTest}. */
/*
 * @Ignore affects the Android test runner (and only the Android test runner): It respects JUnit 4
 * annotations even on JUnit 3 tests.
 *
 * TODO(b/225350400): Remove @Ignore, which doesn't seem like it should be necessary and probably
 * soon won't be.
 */

   * currently skipping MediumTests on Android, and we skip them by not making them present at
   * runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on
   * Android.... The right long-term fix is probably to get MediumTests running under Android by
   * default and then suppress them strategically as needed.
   */

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>For more discussion, see {@linkplain com.google.common.base.AndroidIncompatible the

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>For more discussion, see {@linkplain com.google.common.base.AndroidIncompatible the

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>For more discussion, see {@linkplain com.google.common.base.AndroidIncompatible the