setException(t);
      return;
    } finally {
      function = null;
    }

    /*
     * If set()/setValue() throws an Error, we let it propagate. Why? The most likely Error is a
     * StackOverflowError (from deep transform(..., directExecutor()) nesting), and calling
     * setException(stackOverflowError) would fail:
     *

      this.function = checkNotNull(function);
    }

    /**
     * The default implementation inherited is based on iteration and removal of each element which
     * can be overkill. That's why we forward this call directly to the backing list.
     */
    @Override
    protected void removeRange(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {
      fromList.subList(fromIndex, toIndex).clear();
    }

    @Override

    )
  override val sink =
    FramingSink(
      finished = outFinished,
    )
  internal val readTimeout = StreamTimeout()
  internal val writeTimeout = StreamTimeout()

  /**
   * The reason why this stream was closed, or null if it closed normally or has not yet been
   * closed.
   *
   * If there are multiple reasons to abnormally close this stream (such as both peers closing it

     * for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,
     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {

        .isEqualTo(0xFFEEDDCC);
  }

  public void testByteArrayRoundTrips() {
    Random r = new Random(5);
    byte[] b = new byte[Ints.BYTES];

    // total overkill, but, it takes 0.1 sec so why not...
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      int num = r.nextInt();
      assertThat(Ints.fromByteArray(Ints.toByteArray(num))).isEqualTo(num);

      r.nextBytes(b);

@Tag("Slow")
class RealWebSocketTest {
  // NOTE: Fields are named 'client' and 'server' for cognitive simplicity. This differentiation has
  // zero effect on the behavior of the WebSocket API which is why tests are only written once
  // from the perspective of a single peer.
  private val random = Random(0)
  private val taskFaker = TaskFaker()
  private val sockets = inMemorySocketPair(8192L)

      <!-- src-super is copied to guava-gwt-sources (so that we can strip its @Nullable annotations), so we don't need to list it here. We may want to arrange something similar for test-super someday. -->
      <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Why do we have separate src and src-super directories, anyway? -->
      <resource>
        <directory>${project.build.directory}/guava-gwt-sources</directory>
      </resource>
    </resources>
    <testResources>

    return new ImmutableSortedMap<K, V>(delegate, comparator);
  }

  /*
   * We don't permit nulls, but we wrap every comparator with nullsFirst().
   * Why? We want for queries like containsKey(null) to return false, but the
   * GWT SortedMap implementation that we delegate to throws
   * NullPointerException if the comparator does. Since our construction

     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *
     * On the other hand, the current signature is consistent with the similar allAsList method. And

    DelayingIdentityLoader(AtomicBoolean shouldWait, CountDownLatch delayLatch) {
      this.shouldWait = shouldWait;
      this.delayLatch = delayLatch;
    }

    @CanIgnoreReturnValue // Sure, why not?
    @Override
    public T load(T key) throws InterruptedException {
      if (shouldWait.get()) {
        delayLatch.await();
      }
      return key;
    }
  }