/*
       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

 * test with reference to the same "lock-like object", and then their interactions with that object
 * are choreographed via the various methods on this class.
 *
 * <p>A "lock-like object" is really any object that may be used for concurrency control. If the
 * {@link #callAndAssertBlocks} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a

 * annotated by {@link TestSubtype}.
 *
 * <p>These declaration methods rely on Java static type checking to make sure what we want to
 * assert as subtypes are really subtypes according to javac. For example:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * class MySubtypeTests extends SubtypeTester {
 *   @TestSubtype(suppressGetSubtype = true, suppressGetSupertype = true)

        return (GetCheckedTypeValidator) theClass.getEnumConstants()[0];
      } catch (ClassNotFoundException
          | RuntimeException
          | Error t) { // ensure we really catch *everything*
        return weakSetValidator();
      }
    }
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): change parameter order to match other helper methods (Class, Throwable)?

     * parameters, and as it turns out Firefox and Chrome actually do rather different things, and
     * both say in their comments that they're not really sure what the right approach is. We go
     * with Chrome's behavior (which also experimentally seems to match what IE does), but if you

     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

    while (!descendant.equals(ancestor)) {
      classes.add(descendant);
      descendant = descendant.getSuperclass();
    }

    return classes;
  }

  /**
   * Not really a signature -- just the parts that affect whether one method is a fauxveride of a
   * method from an ancestor class.
   *
   * <p>See JLS 8.4.2 for the definition of the related "override-equivalent."
   */

    while (!descendant.equals(ancestor)) {
      classes.add(descendant);
      descendant = descendant.getSuperclass();
    }

    return classes;
  }

  /**
   * Not really a signature -- just the parts that affect whether one method is a fauxveride of a
   * method from an ancestor class.
   *
   * <p>See JLS 8.4.2 for the definition of the related "override-equivalent."
   */

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);

  C endpoint() {
    return endpoint;
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // catching CCE
  @Override
  public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
    if (obj instanceof Cut) {
      // It might not really be a Cut<C>, but we'll catch a CCE if it's not
      Cut<C> that = (Cut<C>) obj;
      try {
        int compareResult = compareTo(that);
        return compareResult == 0;