### `response_model` Priority

If you declare both a return type and a `response_model`, the `response_model` will take priority and be used by FastAPI.

This way you can add correct type annotations to your functions even when you are returning a type different than the response model, to be used by the editor and tools like mypy. And still you can have FastAPI do the data validation, documentation, etc. using the `response_model`.

 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 * 
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 * 
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public

  // For example: (long) data[i++] | (long) data[i++] << 8 | ...
  // If data[i] == (byte) 0x80, the first cast will sign-extend it to 0xffffffffffffff80,
  // masking the remaining seven bytes.
  // To test this, we give an input where bit 7 is not cleared. For example:
  // (1) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 80
  // (2) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 81
  // (3) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 ff (or anything in between)

  // For example: (long) data[i++] | (long) data[i++] << 8 | ...
  // If data[i] == (byte) 0x80, the first cast will sign-extend it to 0xffffffffffffff80,
  // masking the remaining seven bytes.
  // To test this, we give an input where bit 7 is not cleared. For example:
  // (1) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 80
  // (2) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 81
  // (3) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 ff (or anything in between)

<blockquote markdown="1">

**FastAPI** würde ohne die frühere Arbeit anderer nicht existieren.

Es wurden zuvor viele Tools entwickelt, die als Inspiration für seine Entwicklung dienten.

Ich habe die Schaffung eines neuen Frameworks viele Jahre lang vermieden. Zuerst habe ich versucht, alle von **FastAPI** abgedeckten Funktionen mithilfe vieler verschiedener Frameworks, Plugins und Tools zu lösen.

usual case for many corporate users. The new implementation
performance is now in the order of milliseconds, compared to
the previous implementation which could take several seconds,

   * ClassLoader that loaded that class from later being garbage-collected. If anything continues
   * to reference the FinalizableReferenceQueue class then its ClassLoader cannot be
   * garbage-collected, even if there are no more instances of FinalizableReferenceQueue itself.
   * The code in FinalizableReferenceQueue goes to considerable trouble to ensure that there are

If you go to the **API docs UI** at `/docs` you will be able to see the **documentation** for cookies for your *path operations*.

But even if you **fill the data** and click "Execute", because the docs UI works with **JavaScript**, the cookies won't be sent, and you will see an **error** message as if you didn't write any values.

///

## Forbid Extra Cookies

 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even
 *       <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one
 *       that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source

But **FastAPI** will handle it, give you the correct data in your function, and validate and document the correct schema in the *path operation*.

You can also declare singular values to be received as part of the body.