import java.text.DateFormat
import java.text.ParsePosition
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat
import java.util.Date
import java.util.Locale
import okhttp3.internal.UTC

/** The last four-digit year: "Fri, 31 Dec 9999 23:59:59 GMT". */
internal const val MAX_DATE = 253402300799999L

/**
 * Most websites serve cookies in the blessed format. Eagerly create the parser to ensure such
 * cookies are on the fast path.
 */

            It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you.
          close-issue-message: >
            This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 1 year.

            value: String,
          ) = writer.writeUtf8(value)
        },
    )

  /**
   * A timestamp like "191216030210Z" or "191215190210-0800" for 2019-12-15T19:02:10-08:00. The
   * cutoff of the 2-digit year is 1950-01-01T00:00:00Z.
   */
  val UTC_TIME =
    BasicDerAdapter(
      name = "UTC TIME",
      tagClass = DerHeader.TAG_CLASS_UNIVERSAL,
      tag = 23L,
      codec =

// Intended to be used in unit tests.
func (b BatchJobYamlErr) message() string {
	return b.msg
}

// Error implements Error interface
func (b BatchJobYamlErr) Error() string {
	return fmt.Sprintf("%s\n Hint: error near line: %d, col: %d", b.msg, b.line, b.col)
}

// BatchJobKV is a key-value data type which supports wildcard matching
type BatchJobKV struct {
	line, col int
	Key       string `yaml:"key" json:"key"`

                return props;
            }
        };
        assertEquals(Long.valueOf(-86400000), negativeEnv.getTimeAdjustTimeMillisAsLong());

        // Test large value (one year as mentioned in comment)
        FessEnv.SimpleImpl yearEnv = new FessEnv.SimpleImpl() {
            protected Properties prepareProperties() {
                Properties props = new Properties();

        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the
        community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address
        the real use case, or whether or not a different abstraction might be more appropriate.

 * The packaging type determines the structure of the project's output and how Maven will treat the resulting artifact.</p>
 *
 * <p>Common packaging types include {@code jar}, {@code war}, {@code pom}, {@code maven-plugin}, {@code ear}, and others.
 * These types influence various aspects of the build lifecycle, such as which plugins are executed and how dependencies are managed.</p>
 *

          <association>
            <type>Repository</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
          <comment>
            This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own.
          </comment>
        </field>
        <field xdoc.separator="blank">

        }
    }

    // Test with very large time adjustment values
    public void test_largeTimeAdjustmentValues() {
        // Test with milliseconds in a year
        long yearInMillis = 365L * 24L * 60L * 60L * 1000L;

        FessConfig yearConfig = new FessConfig.SimpleImpl() {
            private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

            @Override

    void testReadBytesWireFormatMaxBufferIndex() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        byte[] buffer = new byte[65536]; // Large buffer
        int bufferIndex = 65534; // Near the end

        // Set structure size to 2
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(2, buffer, bufferIndex);

        int result = response.readBytesWireFormat(buffer, bufferIndex);

        assertEquals(2, result);