* will prefer pooled connections. Only pooled HTTP/2 connections are used for such de-duplication.
 *
 * It is possible to cancel the finding process by canceling its call.
 *
 * Implementations of this interface are not thread-safe. Each instance is thread-confined to the
 * thread executing the call.
 */
interface RoutePlanner {
  val address: Address

  /** Follow-ups for failed plans and plans that lost a race. */

 * full queue, the queue automatically removes its head element. This is different from conventional
 * bounded queues, which either block or reject new elements when full.
 *
 * <p>This class is not thread-safe, and does not accept null elements.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class EvictingQueue<E> extends ForwardingQueue<E> implements Serializable {

  }

  public void testCreate() {
    Subscriber s1 = Subscriber.create(bus, this, getTestSubscriberMethod("recordingMethod"));
    assertThat(s1).isInstanceOf(Subscriber.SynchronizedSubscriber.class);

    // a thread-safe method should not create a synchronized subscriber
    Subscriber s2 = Subscriber.create(bus, this, getTestSubscriberMethod("threadSafeMethod"));
    assertThat(s2).isNotInstanceOf(Subscriber.SynchronizedSubscriber.class);
  }

	return &Reader{
		args:       args,
		decoder:    d,
		valueCh:    d.Stream(),
		readCloser: readCloser,
	}
}

// syncReadCloser will wrap a readcloser and make it safe to call Close while
// reads are running.
type syncReadCloser struct {
	rc io.ReadCloser
	mu sync.Mutex
}

func (pr *syncReadCloser) Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) {

    void testGetTrustedDomains_Success() throws IOException, SmbAuthException {
        // This test is complex due to static method dependencies and reflection access
        // For now, we'll test the disabled path which is safer
        testDfs.setDisabled(true);
        assertNull(testDfs.getTrustedDomains(auth));
    }

    @Test
    void testIsTrustedDomain() throws SmbAuthException {

    private volatile LocalDateTime lastAccessedAt;

    /** The list of messages in this session. */
    private List<ChatMessage> messages;

    /** Lock object for thread-safe message operations. */
    private final Object messagesLock = new Object();

    /**
     * Default constructor.
     */
    public ChatSession() {
        this.sessionId = UUID.randomUUID().toString();

  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  /*
   * SetMultimap.asMap essentially returns a Map<K, Set<V>>; we just can't declare it that way.
   * Thus, calls like asMap().values().remove(someSet) are safe because they are comparing a set to
   * a collection of other sets.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("CollectionUndefinedEquality")
  public void testValuesRemove() {

        // Assert
        assertNull(ex.getCause(), "Null cause should be preserved");
        assertNotNull(ex.toString(), "toString should be safe to call");
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @NullAndEmptySource
    @ValueSource(strings = { "oops", "multi word", "中文" })
    @DisplayName("Message+Cause constructor: preserves both values; no interactions with cause")

  ImmutableList() {}

  public static <E> Collector<E, ?, ImmutableList<E>> toImmutableList() {
    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableList();
  }

  // Casting to any type is safe because the list will never hold any elements.
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  public static <E> ImmutableList<E> of() {
    return (ImmutableList<E>) RegularImmutableList.EMPTY;
  }

    return requireNonNull(values);
  }

  /*
   * The following methods are safe to call as long as the conditions in the *previous* comment are
   * met *and* the index is less than size().
   *
   * (The above explains when these methods are safe from a `nullness` perspective. From an
   * `unchecked` perspective, they're safe because we put only K/V elements into each array.)
   */

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")