import org.opensearch.index.query.QueryBuilders;

/**
 * Implementation of IndexUpdateCallback that handles file list index updates with concurrent processing.
 * This callback processes file events (create, modify, delete) and manages document indexing and deletion
 * operations in the search engine. It supports recursive crawling with configurable depth and access count limits.
 *

To improve this, we’re working on automation tools 🤖 to manage translations more efficiently. Once ready, documentation will be machine-translated and still reviewed by at least two native speakers ✅ before publishing. This will allow us to keep translations up-to-date while reducing the review burden on maintainers....

# 추가 모델

지난 예제에 이어서, 연관된 모델을 여러개 갖는 것은 흔한 일입니다.

특히 사용자 모델의 경우에 그러한데, 왜냐하면:

* **입력 모델** 은 비밀번호를 가져야 합니다.
* **출력 모델** 은 비밀번호를 가지면 안됩니다.
* **데이터베이스 모델** 은 해시처리된 비밀번호를 가질 것입니다.

/// danger | 위험

절대 사용자의 비밀번호를 평문으로 저장하지 마세요. 항상 이후에 검증 가능한 "안전한 해시(secure hash)"로 저장하세요.

만약 이게 무엇인지 모르겠다면, [security chapters](security/simple-oauth2.md#password-hashing){.internal-link target=_blank}.에서 비밀번호 해시에 대해 배울 수 있습니다.

///

## 다중 모델

In this case, it might not be a problem, because it's the same user sending the password.

But if we use the same model for another *path operation*, we could be sending our user's passwords to every client.

/// danger

Never store the plain password of a user or send it in a response like this, unless you know all the caveats and you know what you are doing.

///

## Add an output model { #add-an-output-model }

Neste caso, pode não ser um problema, porque é o mesmo usuário enviando a senha.

Mas se usarmos o mesmo modelo para outra *operação de rota*, poderíamos estar enviando as senhas dos nossos usuários para todos os clientes.

/// danger | Perigo

Nunca armazene a senha simples de um usuário ou envie-a em uma resposta como esta, a menos que você saiba todas as ressalvas e saiba o que está fazendo.

///

## Adicionar um modelo de saída

# モデル - より詳しく

先ほどの例に続き、複数の関連モデルを持つことが一般的です。

これはユーザーモデルの場合は特にそうです。なぜなら:

* **入力モデル** にはパスワードが必要です。
* **出力モデル**はパスワードをもつべきではありません。
* **データベースモデル**はおそらくハッシュ化されたパスワードが必要になるでしょう。

/// danger | 危険

ユーザーの平文のパスワードは絶対に保存しないでください。常に認証に利用可能な「安全なハッシュ」を保存してください。

知らない方は、[セキュリティの章](security/simple-oauth2.md#password-hashing){.internal-link target=_blank}で「パスワードハッシュ」とは何かを学ぶことができます。

///

## 複数のモデル

								<li class="nav-item" data-bs-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left" title="<la:message key="labels.eol_error" />">
									<a class="nav-link active" href="${eolLink}" target="_olh"><em class="fas fa-times-circle text-danger"></a>
								</li>
							</c:if>
							<c:if test="${developmentMode}">
								<li class="nav-item" data-bs-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="left"
									title="<la:message key="labels.development_mode_warning" />"

        </field>
        <field>
          <name>usePluginRegistry</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <description>
            Whether Maven should use the {@code plugin-registry.xml} file to manage plugin versions.
          </description>
          <type>boolean</type>
          <defaultValue>false</defaultValue>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>offline</name>

import com.google.common.cache.CacheLoader;
import com.google.common.cache.LoadingCache;

/**
 * Helper class for managing Fess plugins and artifacts.
 * This class provides functionality to discover, install, and manage various types of plugins
 * including data stores, themes, ingest processors, scripts, web applications, thumbnails, and crawlers.
 */
public class PluginHelper {
    /** Logger instance for this class */

    return (timeoutNanos <= 0L) ? 0L : timeoutNanos - (System.nanoTime() - startTime);
  }

  /**
   * Signals some other thread waiting on a satisfied guard, if one exists.
   *
   * <p>We manage calls to this method carefully, to signal only when necessary, but never losing a
   * signal, which is the classic problem of this kind of concurrency construct. We must signal if