You can combine normal FastAPI *path operations* with GraphQL on the same application.

/// tip

**GraphQL** solves some very specific use cases.

It has **advantages** and **disadvantages** when compared to common **web APIs**.

Make sure you evaluate if the **benefits** for your use case compensate the **drawbacks**. 🤓

///

## GraphQL Libraries

        }
        stringBuilder
                .append(":")
                .append(dependency.getVersion())
                .append("@")
                .append(dependency.getScope() == null ? "compile" : dependency.getScope());
        if (dependency.isOptional()) {
            stringBuilder.append("[optional]");
        }
        if (!dependency.getExclusions().isEmpty()) {

			if istiodReset && outputLogLevel != "" {
				logCmd.Println(logCmd.UsageString())
				return fmt.Errorf("--level cannot be combined with --reset")
			}
			if istiodReset && stackTraceLevel != "" {
				logCmd.Println(logCmd.UsageString())
				return fmt.Errorf("--stack-trace-level cannot be combined with --reset")
			}
			return nil
		},
		RunE: func(logCmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error {

            Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList("4.0.0", "4.1.0"));

    private static final Pattern EXPRESSION_NAME_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{(.+?)}");
    private static final Pattern EXPRESSION_PROJECT_NAME_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{(project.+?)}");

    private static final String ILLEGAL_FS_CHARS = "\\/:\"<>|?*";

    private static final String ILLEGAL_VERSION_CHARS = ILLEGAL_FS_CHARS;

      long hash1 = lowerEight(bytes);
      long hash2 = upperEight(bytes);

      boolean bitsChanged = false;
      long combinedHash = hash1;
      for (int i = 0; i < numHashFunctions; i++) {
        // Make the combined hash positive and indexable
        bitsChanged |= bits.set((combinedHash & Long.MAX_VALUE) % bitSize);
        combinedHash += hash2;
      }
      return bitsChanged;
    }

    @Override

    return FluentIterable.from(ImmutableList.<Number>of());
  }

  /*
   * The following tests demonstrate the shortcomings of or() and test that the casting workaround
   * mentioned in the method Javadoc does in fact compile.
   */

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeError1() {
    Optional<Integer> optionalInt = getSomeOptionalInt();
    // Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // error
  }

            throw new IORuntimeException(e);
        }
    }

    protected String getTokenValue(final String tokenPattern, final String content) {
        final Matcher matcher = Pattern.compile(tokenPattern).matcher(content);
        if (matcher.find()) {
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Matched: {}", matcher.group());
            }

  }

  /** @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code existingValue} is not null. */
  /*
   * We could have declared this method 'static' but the additional compile-time checks achieved by
   * referencing the type variables seem worthwhile.
   */
  final void checkNoDuplicate(R rowKey, C columnKey, @CheckForNull V existingValue, V newValue) {
    checkArgument(

        }
        final Matcher matcher = getTagPattern().matcher(input);
        final StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
        final Pattern attrPattern = Pattern.compile("\\s[^ ]+=\"([^\"]*)\"");
        while (matcher.find()) {
            final String tagStr = matcher.group();
            final Matcher attrMatcher = attrPattern.matcher(tagStr);

// This type is beta-level in 1.8
message NetworkPolicyEgressRule {
  // ports is a list of destination ports for outgoing traffic.
  // Each item in this list is combined using a logical OR. If this field is
  // empty or missing, this rule matches all ports (traffic not restricted by port).
  // If this field is present and contains at least one item, then this rule allows