/**
     * The value of the label type (alphanumeric and underscore only).
     */
    @Required
    @Size(max = 100)
    @Pattern(regexp = "^[a-zA-Z0-9_]+$")
    public String value;

    /**
     * The paths to include for this label type.
     */
    @CustomSize(maxKey = "form.admin.max.input.size")
    public String includedPaths;

    /**
     * The paths to exclude for this label type.
     */

  public final @Nullable V forcePut(K key, V value) {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Serialized type for all ImmutableBiMap instances. It captures the logical contents and they are
   * reconstructed using public factory methods. This ensures that the implementation types remain
   * as implementation details.
   *
   * <p>Since the bimap is immutable, ImmutableBiMap doesn't require special logic for keeping the

	"database/sql"
	"database/sql/driver"
	"go/ast"
	"reflect"
)

// Expression expression interface
type Expression interface {
	Build(builder Builder)
}

// NegationExpressionBuilder negation expression builder
type NegationExpressionBuilder interface {
	NegationBuild(builder Builder)
}

// Expr raw expression
type Expr struct {
	SQL                string
	Vars               []interface{}
	WithoutParentheses bool
}

<link href="${fe:url('/css/admin/bootstrap.min.css')}" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link href="${fe:url('/css/admin/font-awesome.min.css')}" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link href="${fe:url('/css/admin/adminlte.min.css')}" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link href="${fe:url('/css/admin/style.css')}" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="${fe:url('/css/admin/html5shiv.min.js')}"></script>

	relations := []Relation{
		{
			Name: "Account", Type: schema.HasOne, Schema: "User", FieldSchema: "Account",
			References: []Reference{{"ID", "User", "UserID", "Account", "", true}},
		},
		{
			Name: "Pets", Type: schema.HasMany, Schema: "User", FieldSchema: "Pet",
			References: []Reference{{"ID", "User", "UserID", "Pet", "", true}},
		},
		{
			Name: "Toys", Type: schema.HasMany, Schema: "User", FieldSchema: "Toy",

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code